[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Comments on wind farm project run pro and con 

Comments about a proposed wind farm to be placed near Pilot Butte are trickling into the county’s Planning and Zoning Department.

Three comments, both for and against the project, were submitted after the Planning and Zoning Board’s decision to approve the project.

One comment, from Green River resident Brent Andersen, questioned the placement of the windfarm, arguing that there could be other places for the farm to exist.

“We have miles and miles of nondescript land in the county. Why would any thinking person plant these towering generators on the Wild Horse Loop,” Andersen wrote in an e-mail to the zoning department.

Andersen also wrote that the loop tour and Pilot Butte were unique county features enjoyed by tourists and residents, with Pilot Butte being a historic place.

According to Ruth Lauritzen, the curator of the Sweetwater County Museum, Pilot Butte is the highest point on White Mountain. At 7,932 feet, the butte was a landmark used by pioneers traveling on the Oregon, Overland, Cherokee, Mormon and California Trails.

The prominence, accessible by a pipe ladder, allows visitors to survey the surrounding area. Additionally, Lauritzen said a plaque was placed on the butte to commemorate a Masonic Lodge meeting hosted at the butte Sept. 5, 1941.

Kim Brown, a Farson resident, supports the project.

“Just a comment that I would make is that wind power is a very clean way to produce power with minimal environmental issues,” Brown wrote.

“I would think it’s time for the Bureau of Land Management and other agencies to step up to the plate and work to help more of this type of energy development … to keep the AC and heat going in their nice offices with clean, environmentally safe power,” Brown concluded.

A third person, Marie Moe, of Green River, joined Andersen in his concerns of where the proposed wind farm would be placed.

“Harnessing the wind for electricity is something I support wholeheartedly, but the location of this system is unacceptable,” Moe wrote in her comment.

“We have laws forbidding citizens from picking up rocks and taking them home for their rock gardens, but we are going to stick gigantic eyesores in the Wild Horse area?”

Moe was curious if the project required a cultural or environmental impact study.

The county’s windfarm regulations do require an environmental impact assessment. Tesco Engineering addressed each item with a one or two sentence response.

The engineering firm also provided maps showing a number of environmentally critical areas, such as critical winter ranges and sage grouse seasonal restriction areas, but did not indicate where the wind generators would be located in relationship to those areas.

“The environmental assessment was light,” Mark Kot, the county’s planning and zoning director said.

Both the Green River Chamber of Commerce and the Sweetwater County Travel and Tourism Board decided to take no position on the wind farm proposal.

Dave Hanks of Rock Springs Chamber of Commerce was unavailable for comment at press time.

Jenissa Bartlett, director of the travel and tourism, said the tourism board hoped the company would invest in interpretive signage to explain the project.

“We understand it’s multi use land,” Bartlett said.

David Tate, a member of the travel and tourism board said the board had a difficult time deciding one way or the other because there were members both for and against the project.

Janet Hartford echoed Bartlett, saying the chamber decided to not oppose the project and hoped signs would be placed to explain the project.

Hartford said the road gets a lot of traffic and didn’t expect the horses to permanently leave the area after the generators were built.

“We’ve seen with oil and gas industry reclamation that (the horses) come back to eat the reclaimed plants,” Hartford said.

Hartford added the project may have a visual impact on the area and could impact the Run With the Horses Marathon, but concluded the chamber also understands the land is multi use land.

The issue is slated to be on the agenda at next week’s meeting of the Sweetwater County Commissioners

By David Martin
Regional Editor

The Green River Star

26 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky