[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lots of reasons to keep zoning as it is  

I grew up, operated and still actively participate with my son on our family farm. Over all that time I have seen many trends in the agricultural business, but wind power generation is not one I consider to be agricultural based. Yet, our county leadership wants to allow these types of facilities permitted uses in our agricultural zones without any zoning board review or forum for public protest. The claim is to streamline the system but all it actually does is open the door for more and more wind turbines to be scattered about without any formal protest opportunity for neighboring land owners.

Once these wind turbines are given agricultural zoning they will be taxed no differently than a stalk of corn. I don’t see this as fairness to anyone in the county whether you are for or against wind power. These facilities are an energy producing industry and should be taxed as any other industrial use of land. If the claim is they will generate so much income then, as county residents who have to share the landscape with these monstrosities, we should get the full benefit of the tax dollars that they are worth.

Recently the county chairman, a longtime acquaintance of mine, presented proposals to two school districts that would benefit from wind turbines. The plan “promises” several thousand dollars, however, is the land that the turbines are constructed on is taxed appropriately these schools would receive thousands of dollars more than that plan.

I am opposed to the construction of wind turbines here in Stephenson County, but if it is inevitable, I urge the county board to uphold the zoning board’s decision to deny these zoning amendments. Then, as a group along with the major taxing bodies affected, draft a plan that is fair to everyone whether opponent or proponent which includes fair taxation and revenue distribution, adequate setback distances, a guaranteed decommissioning plan, and a proper opportunity for protests to be heard.

Ron Dornink


The Journal-Standard

10 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.