[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Black Nubble wind project supporters line up  

PORTLAND – Backers of the Black Nubble wind power project pointed to a diverse array of groups supporting the plan as evidence it deserves to be approved.

At a press conference Tuesday, the Natural Resources Council of Maine released a list of more than 20 organizations, including faith-based groups and those that advocate for health issues, that support the Black Nubble wind power project. The project calls for 18 wind turbines on Black Nubble Mountain in western Maine.

“I think this is a very significant day in the development of wind power in Maine,” Pete Didisheim, advocacy director of the Natural Resources Council of Maine, said Tuesday. Didisheim said the varied group of supporters indicates the project strikes the right balance between preserving special places and increasing renewable energy.

The list includes the Conservation Law Foundation, Maine Center for Economic Policy, American Lung Association of Maine, Maine Council of Churches and the Maine State Chamber of Commerce.

Supporters say that underscores the growing acceptance of wind power as a source of clean energy that can lessen reliance on fossil fuels. Several of the groups cited the threat of climate change as part of their rationale for supporting the project.

Not everybody supports the project, however.

Maine Audubon, one of the state’s largest environmental groups, said Tuesday it would oppose the project at Land Use Regulation Commission hearings to be held in September.

Jody Jones, a wildlife ecologist for Maine Audubon, said that while her organization supports wind power on mountains, Black Nubble is simply the wrong site. “We should not throw up 18 turbines as a symbol toward battling global warming,” said Jones.

Maine Audubon was one of many environmental groups that last year opposed the Redington wind power project, which called for erecting 12 turbines on Redington Pond Range and 18 turbines on Black Nubble Mountain.

The Land Use Regulation Commission rejected the Redington project in January by a 6-1 vote.

The environmental impact on sensitive habitat on Redington Pond Range and the scenic impact – the closest turbine on Redington would have been only a mile from the Appalachian Trail – were among the most controversial aspects of that project.

Last month, however, the commission agreed to consider an amended project that featured only the 18-turbine Black Nubble project.

The developer, Maine Mountain Power, said that because Black Nubble is less ecologically sensitive and further from the Appalachian Trail, the amended 54-megawatt project would offer most of the benefits of the previous plan while lessening potential environmental effects.

If the Black Nubble project is approved, Maine Mountain Power says it will forever protect the top of Redington from future wind power development.

Pete Didisheim, of the Natural Resources Council of Maine, said the proposed $110 million project strikes the right balance.

Redington Pond Range, the last unprotected, undeveloped mountain in the state, would be protected under the plan, he said. Black Nubble, at about 3,500 feet, offers less valuable habitat, he said.

“Black Nubble is no Redington. It is a lower elevation. It is further from the Appalachian Trail and much, much more harvested,” said Didisheim. He said most of the proposed turbine locations on Black Nubble have been harvested in the past ten years.

Didisheim said support for the project reflects grassroots support for wind power.

“I believe that Maine people … understand that global warming is a real threat and our current forms of power generation, including from oil and coal, are causing too much harm,” said Didisheim.

Jones, of Maine Audubon, said, however, that the Black Nubble project is not a good plan. “There is a divide in the environmental community,” said Jones.

Jones said that while there is a general desire to site wind power projects in Maine and while her own organization supports wind power – Maine Audubon endorsed the proposed TransCanada wind power project on Kibby Mountain in Franklin County – Black Nubble is simply not a good site.

Black Nubble is part of one of Maine’s premier mountain regions and features habitat for rare and declining plant and animal communities as well as scenic values, said Jones.

To truck the wind turbines up the mountain and anchor them to the ridge, Maine Mountain Power will essentially have to blast the top off the mountain, forever changing its character and values, she said.

Organizations outside the environmental community focused largely on wind power positives.

Edward Miller, chief executive officer of the American Lung Association of Maine, said concern about burning fossil fuels is behind the group’s support of Black Nubble. Miller said his organization was one of the few groups, and perhaps the only public health organization, to go on record supporting the Redington wind power project.

Andy Burt, director of the environmental justice program of the Maine Council of Churches, said her group supports Black Nubble because of concerns about climate change. She said her organization considers climate change one of the greatest moral issues in the world today. “It really is a moral choice to change how we decide to generate and to use electricity,” she said. “I think it is very much in keeping with teachings which are really at the heart of every faith tradition.”

By Alan Crowell
Staff Writer

Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel

11 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.