LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County board failing to represent residents 

The Stephenson County Board has finally admitted that the “Property Protection Plan” for residents effected by the wind farm project was a sham. It was stated at the board meeting that this plan was not to protect the residents but to protect the county from the residents. Mr. Mickleson stated a protection plan would hamper future economic development. What development?

Mr. Mickleson stated this plan would have set a precedent for future projects because no other government had one. Is that fact coming from the same research the board used when they stated there were tire-burning facilities in operation only to have local residents discover there was no such thing and that they are banned?

If residents are forced to negotiate with Navitas over this property protection I know they will be hard pressed to pay for legal representation but in view of the way the County Board has acted so far I don’t believe I would want them negotiating on my behalf.

Some of the actions of these public officials have been blatantly hostile and rude to their constituents and their representatives while embracing the companies seeking to prosper from this project.

Anyone who studied this project would know this should not be in an area with so many homes and an airport in close proximity. We know it and they know it but the board is so eager to grasp at any additional revenue it is failing to reasonably access this issue.

Sam Guffrea

Freeport

journalstandard.com

13 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky