LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine noise risk 

The British Wind Energy Association spokesman Llywelyn Rhys should stick to the facts contained in his own organisation’s literature and that of HM Government as we do in SWATT (South Wales Alternative To Turbines).

The Government (DTI) set up a Noise Working Group in August 2006 to study the wind turbine noise problem, described as aerodynamic modulation (AM) in the DTI report. AM is thought to be a factor in the numerous studies concerning health being affected by wind turbine noise.

The concerns to wildlife habitat are well documented on numerous websites.

The 54% lower value for terraced houses within 1 mile of a wind farm is to be found on the BWEA’s own report, the same report states “….a general consensus amongst (estate) agents that there is a detrimental effect on value either due to close proximity of a wind farm or its visibility.”

Could he tell us which tourism surveys support wind farms?

The Welsh Assembly’s TAN 8 wind farm policy has potential problems unique to Wales, and it is absolute folly to expose perhaps 500,000 people (maybe the 20% of Wales’ population who are against wind turbines, Nimbys) in the South Wales mining valleys to the health and wealth risks of living close to the new generation of noisy giant wind turbines, without first studying the implications to noise/health, wildlife, property values and tourism.

Does the BWEA think it unreasonable that SWATT request that the Welsh Assembly call a moratorium on wind farm development until independent surveys are executed on these vital issues. Concerning the election, our campaign resulted in us getting the issue onto the election agenda. And the two anti-TAN 8 main parties were the ones who gained seats in the elections.

David Edwards
Chairman, SWATT, (South Wales Alternative To Turbines)

thewesternmail

14 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky