[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Bird study doesn't seem objective  

The recent study of the behavior of birds in Forward Energy’s proposed wind factor is riddled with inaccuracies, according to Dr. Jack Kaspar, professor emeritus of ornithology at the University of Wisconsin.

“Does it seem odd to anyone but me that the April 2005 through March 2006 bird study shows exactly what Forward Energy was looking for – even though it was compiled and analyzed by people who have far less professional experience than those who have written studies that are contrary to this one,” stated Dr. Kaspar. “Furthermore, the data does not support the conclusions.”

Horicon Marsh Systems Advocates (HMSA) has been fighting the proposed project since 2004. HMSA filed an appeal in the fall of 2006 with the Wisconsin State Court of Appeals opposing the Public Service Commission’s decision to allow Forward Energy to build the project. As of today, that decision is still pending.

The proposed project would consist of 133 wind turbines standing 400 feet tall over an area of 50 square miles (32,000 acres) within two miles of the Horicon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge.

Anyone who has lived here for any length of time knows that the closer you get to the Horicon Marsh, the more birds you encounter. This is not true according to the 2005-2006 bird study, which clearly indicates to me that this is an inept study.

Not only is the study inept, but according to Dr. Kaspar, “the bird study was written in such a manner as if it/they were trying to hide something or confuse the reader.”

Joe Breaden

Horicon Marsh Systems Advocates

Lomira

fdlreporter.com

30 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter