LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Take caution with wind power 

As the 2007 legislative body begins its new session, we hope skepticism remains for large-scale wind development in Vermont. On the national level, Vermont is relatively insignificant as a wind resource. It ranks 34th. Still, huge federal subsidies and saleable green tags attract foreign investors to this region. This past year, the Northeast Kingdom was inundated by poorly sited wind projects that threatened our communities and rural towns.

Senate President Pro Tempore Peter Shumlin and Speaker of the House Gaye Symington are seeking an ambitious agenda to combat global warming. Although Vermont may or may not impact a global warming crisis, efforts to develop micro-hydro projects, bio fuels, methane plants, small-scale wind for businesses, municipalities and farms, conservation and advanced solar technology are a good start.

More than a year ago, industrial wind developers received nearly $1 million in utility grants to construct 16 420-foot towers in and around Barton, Sheffield, and neighboring Sutton. To protect our region, more than 300 residents, businesses, and visitors have donated more than a half million dollars to preserve our historic buildings, our tourism-based economy, our local businesses, boarding schools, lakes and small towns. For legislators to invest time, money and energy in support of large-scale wind development instead of emphasizing local alternatives is disappointing.

It is difficult to site large industrial projects in Vermont. Designating which communities or landscapes are not historically relevant, scenic or appealing and protecting areas that are environmentally sensitive should take years. If our legislators should err on this issue, they should err on the side of caution. The public should be involved in this process from the very beginning. Communities should be included long before wind developers arrive in a town with the state’s blessing and a bag full of federal money. The costs to every community involved is hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Vermont has a long history of protecting its undeveloped ridgelines. Previous Legislatures have struggled to protect this beautiful landscape for us and we hope this Legislature will be just as vigilant in protecting it for those who will follow.

GREG BRYANT
Sheffield

burlingtonfreepress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky