[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Don't believe the hype "" windfarms are a con 

The whole debate about windfarms seems to be based on their aesthetics and environmental impact, which is to entirely miss the point.

By all means sacrifice Cumbria, indeed the whole UK, to the greater good if this will make any measurable difference to global warming ““ but it will not.

Hitherto the debate has been conducted in a series of elementary sound bites that have convinced the uninformed that if wind is free, wind power must be cheap. It is not.

Take away subsidies and there would be no new windfarms.

There are numerous papers from eminent scientists and electrical engineers that explain why windfarms do not and are most unlikely ever to make a significant contribution.

The enthusiasm for them comes from politicians and the green lobby who like to persuade themselves that they are doing something to tackle climate change and from windfarm operators/land owners who make quite a lot of money out of it.

I understand that some time ago, local authorities received a directive from the office of the Deputy Prime Minister stating that in their planning deliberations, they were not permitted to take into account the efficiency or otherwise of windfarms. I find this appalling.

While money is being poured into highly visible but inefficient windfarms, research and investment in other forms of renewable energy, such as hydro schemes, is reduced.

Germany has more windfarms than any other country and yet has been unable to decommission a single conventional power station. I understand that they are not building any more.

My opposition to windfarms is not because they are not pretty, it is because they are a con, in that they don’t deliver and will not help save the planet, and support for them takes away from other technologies that really might make a difference.

Kirk Rylands
Aspatria Wigton


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky