[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windmill plan stirs up controversy; Clearwater backing raises ire of activists  


By Dan Shapley
Poughkeepsie Journal

The wind energy company that convinced many local towns, businesses and individuals to subsidize the electricity produced from Central New York wind turbines is seeking approvals to build its first wind farm in New York.

Community Energy’s Jordanville Wind Farm would have as many as 75 wind turbines on private land in Herkimer County, about 20 miles north of Cooperstown. The turbines would generate enough power for as many as 60,000 homes.

Local people paying extra for wind power are supplying some of the capital for the Jordanville Wind Farm project. Set in farm country near Glimmerglass Opera House and Otsego Lake, it has been controversial, and that controversy has reached to the Hudson Valley.

In 2003 and 2004, the company sold, at a premium, the 30 megawatts of energy produced by 20 wind turbines standing on farms in the Town of Fenner, Madison County. That wind farm is owned by the Italian energy company, Enel.

Community Energy’s promise to local buyers at the time was that their money would go toward the building of new wind turbines. To that end, the new wind farm, is funded “in part” by the Hudson Valley’s energy purchases, company spokesman Paul Copleman said.

“Community Energy’s model has always linked our renewable energy sales to the development of new wind farms,” he said.

Company bought

The Pennsylvania-based Community Energy was purchased in May by Iberdrola, Spain’s largest energy company. The purchase won’t change Community Energy’s strategy, Copleman said, but it will give the company access to more capital as it aims to build wind farms across the country.

In recent years it has built facilities in Illinois, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The Herkimer County wind farm would be the company’s largest.

Leases on farmland where wind turbines are built would help keep farmers afloat, while producing energy without air pollution.

But there is concern about noise and the alteration of scenery, particularly pastoral and historic landscapes. Some also are concerned that blasting and chemicals that may be used to suppress dust on access roads could taint water.

Officials in the towns of Stark and Warren are reviewing a draft environmental impact statement prepared by Community Energy.

The Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, based in Poughkeepsie, purchases power marketed by Community Energy from the Fenner farm. Its policy is to support wind turbines, if sited as well as possible, even if they have some negativeenvironmental impacts. To generate electricity without generating pollution that causes acid rain, lung illnesses and global warming is worth some compromise, Environmental Director Manna Jo Greene said.

“Historic resources and viewsheds are extremely important, but unless we’re willing to stop using electricity, we can’t keep generating it by unsafe nuclear power and unsafe fossil fuels,” Greene said.

Clearwater gave what Greene described as “conditional” support for the Jordanville Wind project. Hundreds of members then wrote in support of it.

Clearwater learned of it from a member who knows one of the landowners that will be paid to rent turbine space, Greene said, adding Clearwater will study the environmental impacts more thoroughly.

Clearwater’s endorsement drew the ire of Robert Boyle, who lives near Cooperstown, and other opponents.

Boyle was a founding member of the Hudson River Fisherman’s Association, which became the environmental group Riverkeeper. He was a prominent voice in the successful fight to prevent the construction of a hydroelectric-pumped storage power plant on Storm King Mountain. That historic battle lasted decades and was waged largely because opponents didn’t want to see the view of the mountain diminished.

Boyle is vehemently opposed to the Jordanville Wind proposal, and has called on Clearwater to “repudiate” an endorsement he said was based on weak research.

“This enormous project, seven miles long and 3.5-miles wide, about half the size of Manhattan Island, threatens to obliterate sensitive headwater streams and wetlands affecting both the Susquehanna and Mohawk Rivers as well degrading local groundwater supplies,” Boyle wrote to Clearwater, “to say nothing of other adverse impacts.”

Dan Shapley can be reached at dshapley@ poughkeepsiejournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.