[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Environmental group files appeal over Bear Creek wind turbine plan 



A decision to allow a variance to construct nine turbines in Bear Creek Township has been appealed to Luzerne County court.

Defend Our Watershed, a local environmental watchdog group, along with township residents Matthew Hrabousky and William D. and Jeanie Haas, filed the appeal on Tuesday asking the court to reverse a decision by the township zoning hearing board to grant a “use variance” allowing the turbines to be constructed on land zoned for conservation.

The appeal also requests the court to nullify two prior use variances granted for the project in 2001 and 2003 because Energy Unlimited Inc., the firm planning the project, failed to commence with construction within one year of the approvals.

In August 2005, Energy Unlimited requested the variance to construct nine turbines near Crystal Lake on 835 acres of property that Luzerne County acquired from Theta Land Corp. The nine turbines are in addition to 25 turbines previously proposed for the site known as the Penobscot Mountain Wind Farm.

Last week, Luzerne County President Judge Michael Conahan overturned a decision by the township board of supervisors to deny the plan for 25 turbines.

Energy Unlimited originally sought a variance, which was granted, to construct 10 turbines on the property in November 2001. On Oct. 28, 2003, the zoning hearing board modified the decision to allow 26 turbines to be constructed. One of the 26 turbines has since been removed from the project. In August 2005, Energy Unlimited requested a variance for an additional nine turbines, for a total of 34 turbines. Beginning that September, the zoning hearing board conducted 12 hearings on the variance before issuing approval in May 2006.

According to the appeal, wind turbines are not a permitted use on property zoned C-1 (conservation), nor are conditional uses or special exceptions permissible. A variance can be granted if the zoning results in a unnecessary hardship and several conditions are met, including: unique physical characteristics of the property lead to the hardship; the hardship has not been created by the variance applicant; and the variance will not alter the character of the area.

The appeal also alleges the variance should not have been granted because the conditions for hardship were not met and the request should have been considered a new application separate from the two prior variances because construction had not commenced within one year of approval, as required by township ordinance.

Attorney William Higgs, representing Defend Our Watershed, Hrabousky and the Haases, could not be reached for comment.

Defend Our Watershed board member Dr. Henry Smith Jr. said the zoning board was overanxious when it approved the variance.

“Looking at the law and the township ordinances, it’s apparent the zoning board was eager to give this approval despite the township ordinances,” he said.

Attorney Ernie Preate, representing Energy Unlimited, said eight months of testimony from expert witnesses during the zoning hearing process is evidence that the zoning board was correct in granting the variance.

The variance is now before the township planning commission.


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky