Wind opponents eye political solution following court defeat
Credit: by PAT CURRIE, Better Farming, www.betterfarming.com 4 March 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
An Ontario divisional court ruling has left regulations on wind turbines intact and the energy minister in charge
The Ontario Divisional Court’s dismissal Thursday of a challenge to current provincial regulations governing the set-back distance between homes and wind turbine generators was hailed as a victory by the industry but pooh-poohed as no such thing by opponents.
President John Laforet of Wind Concerns Ontario, a coalition of 57 community-based groups across Ontario, said the panel of three judges had ruled only there was no evidence that the provincial government had acted improperly in determining wind turbines had to be set back at least 550 metres from homes.
“The court’s jurisdiction is therefore quite circumscribed,” the judges wrote in their decision dismissing a court challenge by small business owner Ian Hanna, of Prince Edward County. Hanna had claimed there was no medical evidence that the established setback was really safe.
“The situation is not bleak,” Hanna said, noting that the judges had “left it open for the Environmental Review Tribunal” to rule on the setback. “We don’t see this as a loss or a negative so much as it is a shifting of where that determination has to be made,” Hanna said.
Laforet renewed Wind Concerns Ontario’s demand for a fully independent, third-party study to determine what is a safe distance” between turbines and homes.
Laforet noted some eight million Ontario voters in 107 ridings across the province had backed motions for a moratorium on wind farm development until the issue has been determined. “We’re confident that if the government doesn’t change its tune, the voters will change the government” in the next provincial election Oct. 6, he said.
President Robert Hornung of the Canadian Wind Energy Association, representing the wind turbine industry, said Hanna’s unprecedented court challenge “had no merit” and that “the balance of expert scientific and medical information to date clearly indicates there is no direct link between wind turbines and effects on human health.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: