Bill addresses concerns over tall wind turbines and aerial firefighting
Credit: By Carleen Johnson | The Center Square | Feb 1, 2024 | thecentersquare.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A bill aimed at balancing interests between wind turbine farms and aerial firefighting efforts is moving ahead in Olympia.
Rep. Stephanie Barnard, R-Pasco, says committee passage of House Bill 2117, co-sponsored by Rep. Matt Boehnke, R-Kennewick, is a huge milestone.
“We are projected to have more wildfires than ever in the coming years and the place where you put wind turbines is the place where it’s windy and you get fire,” Barnard told The Center Square. “Those go on the top of hills or the place where you have good wind coming through, but when you then have a fire, that can get out of control fast. I mean fire and wind, within minutes that fire is right down to populated areas.”
Barnard went on to say, “We have to make sure that when we’re siting these projects, we take firefighting into consideration … These obstacles create a no-fly zone for certain aircraft.”
The Center Square previously reported the state has about a dozen large-scale wind farms, mostly located in central and southeast Washington. The sheer height of wind turbines is a potential danger to aircraft taking part in fighting fires in the area.
“Government policies need to acknowledge the dangers presented by the placement of utility-scale wind turbines during wildfires, which have the potential to inflict significant harm on lives, homes, and property,” Barnard said.
HB 2117 proposes changes to existing state permitting procedures by requiring applicants to demonstrate approval from responsible agencies like the Department of Natural Resources and fire officials regarding location and height specifications.
“With commercial wind turbines reaching upwards of 500 feet and some as tall as 700 feet, it makes it very difficult and dangerous for pilots navigating firefighting missions,” Barnard said.
One amendment, sponsored by Barnard, would require DNR to offer written comments before permitting decisions for new wind turbine placement.
HB 2117 now advances to the House Rules Committee for scheduling for deliberation and a vote on the House floor.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=106836 ]
