[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

“Irreparable injury:” Courts order dismantling of wind farms in US, France 

Credit:  Joshua S Hill | 9 January 2024 | reneweconomy.com.au ~~

A pair of geographically diverse court decisions handed down in December have ordered two wind farms be dismantled, highlighting the importance for renewable energy developers of securing all necessary approvals, including environmental and social.

The first court decision, handed down by the Court of Appeal in Nimes, France, has ordered the dismantling of a seven-turbine wind farm in Hérault which was built by Énergie Renouvelable du Languedoc (ERL), a subsidiary of German group New.

The company now has 15 months to dismantle the Bernargues wind farm and restore the site to its original state.

Development and construction of the Bernargues wind farm was controversial from the outset, having continued construction despite having its construction permit annulled twice – first in 2006 and then in 2017. Both permit cancellations were due to lack of sufficient information provided during the permitting process, specifically regarding the project’s impact study.

The court’s decision to finally put an end to the wind farm comes after numerous environmental complaints focusing on the turbines’ negative impact on local bird life – specifically, the golden eagle, with one death already recorded of the rare bird.

ERL will face a penalty of €3,000 per day for every day the project remains beyond the 15-month deadline. And while further appeals are possible, having already traversed the French judiciary, ERL will likely find itself without recourse but to dismantle the project.

Across the North Atlantic to the United States, in the state of Oklahoma, a judge in the Tulsa federal court ruled in mid-December that Enel North America, a subsidiary of Italian energy giant Enel, must now dismantle the 150MW Osage Wind Farm.

Following yet another lengthy legal battle, the Tulsa judge ruled in favour of the Osage Nation, citing that the turbines constituted a “continued trespass”.

While there is considerable background and context surrounding the case – including religious beliefs – which fall well beyond the scope of this article, the ruling focuses on the fact that the “developers failed to acquire a mining lease during or after construction, as well as after issuance of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision holding that a mining lease was required.”

Specifically, given that Enel and local developer Osage Wind Farms mined and crushed rocks during construction, this put the developers in violation of the Osage Allotment Act of 1906 which grants the mineral rights including oil, natural gas, and rocks, to the Osage Nation.

US Court of International Trade Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves further concluded that the developers “past and continued refusal to obtain a lease constitute interference with the sovereignty of the Osage Nation and is sufficient to constitute irreparable injury.”

A future trial will be held to assess monetary damages.

According to the Osage Minerals Council, Enel obtained leases from surface owners to construct the wind farm but failed to obtain the necessary lease and approval with the legal mineral rightsholders.

“The Council fights every day to provide for our headright holders,” said Everett Waller, chairman of the Osage Minerals Council.

“We will defend the Mineral Estate against anyone that does not comply with the law and tries to take our lands and resources.

“We are open for business and we look forward to working with anyone who negotiates with us in good faith.”

Both cases highlight the non-negotiability of obtaining all relevant licenses and working in partnership with local and native peoples and authorities. Both ERL and Enel are now on the hook for millions in dismantling costs that could have been avoided if proper consultation during the development and permitting stages.

Source:  Joshua S Hill | 9 January 2024 | reneweconomy.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon