LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Newport, Block Island preservation groups sue to stop offshore wind farms 

Credit:  Christopher Allen - 11/24/2023 - pbn.com ~~

Decrying what it calls the fast-tracking of hundreds of skyscraper-high structures that would dwarf the Statue of Liberty, the Preservation Society of Newport County filed two appeals in federal court on Nov. 22 to vacate the permits issued and halt the development of two offshore wind farms planned off the Rhode Island coastline.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, two separate appeals against the approvals were also filed by the Southeast Lighthouse Foundation, based on Block Island. Both organizations are being represented by Washington D.C.-based law firm Cultural Heritage Partners PLLC.

The four filings assert a case of regulatory capture that led the U.S. Department of Interior and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to “shirking its responsibility to the public and allowing corporate energy developers to set the terms for permitting,” and asks the court to issue a construction injunction and find the developers violated federal laws and regulations governing energy development, including the National Environmental Policy Act and National Historic Preservation Act.

The growth and pace of offshore wind permitting, touted by government officials at every level as necessary to end reliance on fossil fuels, has also sparked debate among some environmentalists for what they view as industrial encroachment on natural resources.

A Nov. 22 press release called the projects “unprecedented” in scale and if completed would adversely affect the collective “viewshed,” historical assets and tourism economy. PSNC CEO, Trudy Coxe, said the nonprofit organization supports green energy, but “for two years … pointed out serious problems with the federal permitting process” she says went unheeded.

“Green energy projects need not come at the unnecessary loss to our community’s irreplaceable character and sense of place,” she said. “These historic resources deserve the due process mandated by federal law.”

According to the federal filings, the wind farms “will despoil ocean views to and from hundreds of historic properties along the coastline” and “industrialize Newport’s iconic Atlantic Ocean views for at least the next 30 years.”

Onshore work for Revolution Wind is already underway, with offshore construction expected to ramp up in 2024. And turbines for South Fork Wind, which would provide 132 megawatts of power to New York, are currently being installed.

A separate statement issued on Nov. 22 by Cultural Heritage attorneys said Block Island “is awakening to the reality that the number of visible turbines off its coast will soon grow” and “despoil the Island’s treasured views for the next 30 years.”

One notable difference between the Newport and Block Island appeals is the claim that Orsted mistreated Block Island by not compensating it for negative environmental and economic impacts. The company reportedly paid $170 million to Brookhaven, New York, and $29 million to the Town of East Hampton, while offering “virtually nothing except a hodgepodge of nonsensical mitigation measures, such as weed-whacking the Lighthouse parking lot,” according to the filing.

SELF chairman Gerry Abbott in a statement said “Block Island is obviously not anti-Wind Energy,” but called the developments “a complete industrialization of our ocean view.”

Messages to representatives for Orsted and the U.S. Department of Interior were not immediately returned.

Source:  Christopher Allen - 11/24/2023 - pbn.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky