[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

The quest for green energy filled my community with violence 

Credit:  November 7, 2023 | By Bia'ni Madsa' Juárez López (Ayuuk and Binnizá) | culturalsurvival.org ~~

The Tehuantepec Isthmus in Oaxaca, Mexico, is a territory shared among the Binnizá, Ikoots, Angpøn, and Ayuuk Peoples that produces 76.8 percent of the country’s wind energy. As of January 2020, 1,600 wind turbines had been installed here at 32 wind farms, and thousands more are in construction plans, in an effort to secure “green energy” to combat climate change.

My generation has witnessed how our community and region went from being a quiet place to one where there is news of violence every day. It seems like yesterday, in my adolescence, when it was common for us to walk almost everywhere in the town. Although it is not small, we would go downtown and walk back at midnight. I made that night journey alone many times, greeting the grandparents who sat in their seats on the street in front of their houses with the doors open behind them.

We were told that mega development projects would bring economic growth, and with them, prosperity. This was one of the main arguments for why the wind energy megaproject was approved in my region, where communities are impoverished and long to improve their living conditions. Indeed, the economic benefits of wind power came, but that did not mean prosperity for the local population—quite the opposite. Bigger vans, new houses, construction of new businesses, houses, and rooms for rent for the new influx of migrant workers, increased entertainment and food businesses, and improvement of infrastructure for wind farms are some of the changes that were visible, especially at the beginning of the expansion of wind farms. However, the social cost is undeniable.

“They kidnapped the neighbor from the carwash to demand 10,000 pesos (approximately $570).” “They kidnapped the family of the teacher on the corner in their own house, they tied them up until they gave them all their belongings.” “Some boys on bikes stabbed someone for stealing their things.” “They killed him to steal his cell phone.” Such conversations have become common among neighbors in the market and in their homes. Due to the increase in violence, entire families, including mine, moved from the city. Others chose, after a kidnapping or extortion, to leave their homes and go rent in a quieter neighborhood in the same city.

Social instability deepened when people began to commercialize the land. Lawsuits and family divisions arose over who had the right to the family lands to rent or sell to wind farms. Cases of dispossession and falsification of documents between siblings and relatives increased over the lands of grandparents that had long been completely forgotten, lands that at one time produced the corn that supported the families. What’s the point of having trucks and a freshly painted house if families are fragmented?

The cost of living has increased. Juchitán today is one of the most expensive places to live in the region. From a brief visit, you will see the streets are now in terrible condition. The growing water scarcity is evident, and the last straw is poor electricity service. Grandparents can no longer sit outside their homes because of safety concerns. It is true: millions of pesos circulate here. We know they exist, but the population sees them fading before our eyes without translating into benefits for the community.

The leaders of the different political parties who took advantage of the opportunity to grab land before the wind energy expansion are among those who have benefited the most. Corruption has increased, and internal battles to strengthen their power and political interests using the wind project are evident. In 2017 alone, the Juchitán city council received 65 million pesos (3.7 million USD) from wind companies, which disappeared without any clarity about the use and destination of these resources. Not to mention the many other irregularities and abuses in the implementation of the projects such as the forced signing of contracts, and lack of clear information in the appropriate language about the project.

An international commercial infrastructure project, the interoceanic corridor, includes a train that promises to transport products between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans faster than the Panama Canal. Already, $2.8 billion of the $7 billion that was budgeted for this project has already been invested. As if this were not enough, the President of Mexico recently visited the Isthmus and promised four more wind farms using the same argument of economic need in the region. But investment projects do not happen in a vacuum; they always bring with them organized crime, leaving the communities in the middle of the crossfire of their battles for territory.

Social instability is not an accident. It is a strategy to control land and make way for many more projects. These funds could have been put to better use to benefit the community. In this story, “green” energy has sacrificed our peace in exchange for money, leaving a deep social crisis in my homeland. No development project, even if it is disguised as green, is worth losing peace of mind.

The people of the Isthmus know that no amount of money can repair the damages, especially the social ones, that have resulted from these projects that are negotiated and defined by businessmen and States in international lobby spaces where they decide the future of regions like ours. This is why I share with you this other side of the development, a perspective that will rarely be heard. Companies and politicians go to communities promising abundance and want to use the Isthmus as an example. Here, we have another side of the story to tell.

Source:  November 7, 2023 | By Bia'ni Madsa' Juárez López (Ayuuk and Binnizá) | culturalsurvival.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon