LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Suffolk campaigners lose offshore wind farm legal battle 

Credit:  15 July 2023 | by Brian Farmer, PA News | bbc.com ~~

A campaign group that raised concerns about the creation of two wind farms off Suffolk has lost a High Court fight with ministers.

Suffolk Energy Action Solutions (SEAS) challenged a decision made last year to allow wind farms to be developed by two subsidiaries of Scottish Power.

It argued that in doing so, the then business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng had acted unlawfully.

A judge on Friday dismissed the group’s challenge.

SEAS had also raised concern about the ability of landowners facing possible compulsory purchase to present objections.

Mr Justice Holgate outlined his conclusions in a written ruling after considering arguments at a High Court hearing in London in May.

He said the central issue had been whether the way a complaint by SEAS, relating to the ability of landowners to present objections, had been dealt with lawfully.

The judge said the wind farms “would deliver” about 7.5% of the UK’s “cumulative deployment target for renewable energy in 2030”.

Cables would export electricity to a “landfall” near Thorpeness then to a substation in Friston, near Leiston.

He said SEAS had been set up in 2019 with members from Aldeburgh, Snape, Friston and neighbouring villages and towns.

“Their object is to protect areas of the coast and countryside said to be threatened by the scheme.

“SEAS supports renewable energy including the proposed offshore works in this case.

“But it contended that [ministers] should refuse development consent for the onshore works because of their impact on people, the countryside, and the environment.

“SEAS submitted that better solutions could and should be found for bringing onshore the electricity generated by wind farms in the North Sea.”

Source:  15 July 2023 | by Brian Farmer, PA News | bbc.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky