Colorado legislators introduce legislation requiring energy companies to remove decommissioned wind turbines
Credit: Scott Weiser | Jun 16, 2023 | denvergazette.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The blight on the landscape of abandoned and decommissioned wind turbines stimulated Colorado’s U.S. Reps. Ken Buck, Doug Lamborn and Harriet Hageman, Wyoming, to introduce the Production Tax Credit Reform Act.
According to a press release, the bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to require energy companies remove decommissioned wind turbines from leased land as a condition of receiving federal tax credits.
Currently energy companies are not obligated to remove wind turbines from leased land once they are decommissioned, putting the onus on landowners – typically farmers and ranchers – to remove the turbines.
According to the United States Geological Survey, as of the first quarter of 2023, there are 72,731 wind turbines covering 43 states, including Guam and Puerto Rico.
A 2011 article by Mark J. Perry, Senior Fellow Emeritus at the American Enterprise Institute, a public policy think tank, says at that time there were an estimated 15,000 or more abandoned wind turbines in the US.
“Forcing heavy financial burdens onto landowners to appease the failing Green New Deal is inappropriate,” Lamborn said in the release. “Government-subsidized infrastructure is not the responsibility of private citizens and must be disposed of by the energy companies that created the mess in the first place.”
There is controversy about the actual number of abandoned windmills that remain standing and what it might cost to remove them.
“The American Wind Energy Association, representing wind power generators, assures the public that owners are contractually obligated to take them down at their own cost and that their salvage value will pay for the cost of doing so,” according to a 2020 article by the Washington Times. “That sounds great, but turns out to be more hopeful than accurate. Wind farm operators have overestimated routinely the salvage value of their windmills and underestimated the costs of removal. Moreover, the windmills do not last a generation, so the cost comes sooner than expected.”
“The burden for removing and disposing of decommissioned wind turbines should not fall on landowners across the Eastern Pains,” said Buck. “Energy companies must remove retired turbines from leased land themselves and not leave it as a costly problem for hardworking landowners to solve.”
While many jurisdictions are now imposing permitting conditions requiring removal and remediation, many installations are on private property where the contract may not include those provisions, according to reports.
“Every square foot of land owned by farmers and ranchers is valuable, and an industry known for tight fiscal margins should not be responsible for disposing of wind turbines subsidized with taxpayer dollars,” said Hageman. “By making removal of decommissioned turbines a condition for Production Tax Credits, private landowners will no longer suffer the financial burden of abandoned or failed green bad deal energy projects.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=106087 ]
