LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Avangrid and Shell–Ocean Winds face $60m in fines for nixed Massachusetts projects 

Credit:  12 June 2023, Updated 13 June 2023 | By Tim Ferry | rechargenews.com ~~

But will be allowed to re-bid.

Massachusetts developers may face fines of up to $60m for withdrawing projects but will still likely be allowed to bid into the state’s upcoming round 4 offshore wind solicitation, the chair of the legislature’s telecommunications, utilities and energy committee said.

Developers seeking to kill projects will pay “to the tune of $48m to $60m … in penalties in order to terminate these contracts,” said legislator Jeffrey Roy of the Massachusetts House of Representatives.

“I understand that developers are fully prepared to pay all of the penalties that the procurement process allows for,” he added, speaking on the podcast Codcast, hosted by the journal CommonWealth.

Massachusetts has contracted 3.2GW across three projects towards its mandate of 5.6GW of capacity by 2027. Nearly all this capacity is at risk, though, with two out of three developers looking to cancel their contracts due to declining economics in the face of 40-year inflation.

Iberdrola-controlled Avangrid filed paperwork with the state Department of Public Utilities (DPU) regulator in January seeking to terminate its 1.2GW Commonwealth Wind project awarded in December 2021.

Last week, the Shell–Ocean Winds joint venture (JV) behind the 1.2GW SouthCoast Wind – formerly Mayflower – likewise revealed that it would file paperwork with the DPU to also cancel the project. SouthCoast was awarded 804MW in the state’s second round in 2020, and another 405MW in the round 3 solicitation in 2021.

SouthCoast set a record for lowest offer in Massachusetts’ round 2 with an accepted bid of $77.76/MW, for 804MW of capacity. Per state law at the time, this new low became the bid ceiling for the next round.

The developer was awarded a further 405MW with a $75/MWh offer in the state’s round 3 in 2021, while Avangrid’s Commonwealth Wind project was selected at $72/MWh.

Fines will likely be the only damages incurred by the developers as the state’s round 4 solicitation doesn’t prevent them from rebidding the projects that they withdrew.

Massachusetts in May released its draft round 4 solicitation for up to 3.6GW that exceeds the legal mandate but anticipates the potential withdrawal of either or both projects.

“I fully support the notion that we should not preclude them from bidding on the next round,” said Roy.

“There aren’t too many players in this space,” Roy said. “We want these two developers to be able to bid so that we can get real competition.”

Commonwealth and SouthCoast are both advanced in the federal permitting system and are expected to be fully approved either late this year or early 2024.

While new players have entered the sector as the Biden administration pushes for its 30GW by 2030 goal, besides Avangrid and SouthCoast, only Orsted and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP) own leases in the Massachusetts and Rhode Island wind energy areas (WEAs).

The state will also be competing for interest from New Jersey and New York, both of which are closer to the mammoth New York Bight WEA and have even larger procurement targets of up to 4GW and 4.7GW, respectively.

Joseph Curtatone, the president of the Northeast Clean Energy Council, said on the same podcast that Massachusetts needs to focus on learning from the experience to craft better procurements.

“How do we create even greater flexibility transparency to all parties and our stakeholders, ratepayers and our constituents and execute these crucial projects that are so vital for our climate action goals in our economy?” he asked.

The Massachusetts round 4 request for proposals enables additional flexibility by allowing bidders to submit “an alternative indexed pricing proposal intended to reduce risk to bidders and ratepayers”.

“Initial projects have to lay the groundwork, and that costs money,” said Curtatone.

Massachusetts’ – and the nation’s – first commercial scale wind farm, the>800MW Vineyard Wind 1, located 15 miles (24 km) off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard, drove the first of 64 monopile foundations last week and will likely be feeding power to the grid by the end of this year.

Source:  12 June 2023, Updated 13 June 2023 | By Tim Ferry | rechargenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky