[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy developer files to scrap power agreements 

Credit:  by Chris Lisinski, State House News Service | December 16, 2022 | newbedfordlight.org ~~

Declaring that the largest offshore wind farm in the state’s pipeline “cannot be financed and built” under existing contracts, Commonwealth Wind on Friday asked Massachusetts regulators to scrap the agreements the company reached with utilities and reopen a new round of bidding.

Commonwealth Wind filed a motion with the Department of Public Utilities (DPU) seeking dismissal of the power purchase agreements it reached with utility companies in May, which would render them moot, and a reopening of the process of procuring the project’s 1,200 megawatts of clean wind energy.

If the DPU agrees, Commonwealth Wind said it would file a new, updated bid with more viable financial terms. That’s a risky step: utilities working with the Baker administration could opt to pick a different developer to replace offshore wind capacity and cut Commonwealth Wind out of the picture entirely.

The dramatic escalation comes after nearly two months of public back-and-forth about the viability of the planned offshore wind installation, with developer Avangrid arguing that a combination of economic factors including sharp inflation and the Russian war in Ukraine imperiled its ability to finance the project.

“We have to get to a point where the contract allows the project to go to financing, and under the current structure, it just isn’t there,” Avangrid Senior Vice President for State Government Affairs Kim Harriman told the News Service. “We have to be able to finance it, and frankly, we can’t do that with the current contract. So we think that going out to bid in 2023, that the state issuing that bid, will allow us to put in a contract proposal that reflects a project that we can finance.”

The DPU, which will remain under the purview of the Baker administration for about three more weeks until Gov.-elect Maura Healey takes office, will need to decide whether to approve Commonwealth Wind’s motion to dismiss the contracts or reject it.

A DPU spokesperson did not immediately comment Friday. Representatives for National Grid, Eversource and Unitil, the utilities with which Commonwealth Wind agreed to contracts in May, could not be reached immediately.

Gov. Charlie Baker said in November that his team had “no interest in reopening anything” and viewed debate about the contracts as “a discussion to take place between them and the utilities.”

“Let’s remember, these are long-term contracts, like really long-term contracts,” Baker said. “And while there may be some choppy water at the moment with respect to interest rates and supply chains and all the rest, we’re talking about a deal that basically lasts for 15 years, some of them more than that, depending upon what actually happens over that period of time. I think it’s premature for people to think that where we sit now is necessarily representative of where things are going to be over time.”

Commonwealth Wind said in late October that its proposed installation “is no longer viable” and could not advance under the terms of the contracts with utilities reached in May. The company at the time asked DPU to pause its review of the power purchase agreements so it could work on amendments with utilities, who had no interest in renegotiation.

After state regulators set a hard deadline for Commonwealth Wind to commit to its project or back away from the table, the company said it “believes there is a path forward” but would need to find a solution to “unprecedented economic challenges.”

Harriman said in the month since then, the utility companies with whom Commonwealth Wind contracted are “refusing to come to the table.”

“We are coming up to the end of the year, and time is slipping through our fingers, frankly,” Harriman said. “In order to avoid protracted litigation – I mean, you’ve got counterparties not even willing to talk and have said, verbatim, we’re not going to negotiate no matter what they say – it seems to us that the best way forward to deliver cost-effective clean energy for residents of Massachusetts is to move for this dismissal.”

Harriman said she is optimistic the project’s timeline, which eyes a start to operations by 2028, would not be upended if Commonwealth Wind secures new terms in a bid.

State law requires a new round of solicitation for offshore wind development within 24 months after the last round, which Commonwealth Wind attorneys said means the next cycle will need to open by May 7, 2023.

“Let me be really clear that we’re not abandoning this project,” Harriman said. “We are continuing to invest in the project and permitting and development as we prepare for this next solicitation. Really, this isn’t a pause or a stop. It’s just we’ve got to find a path forward.”

Avangrid is also involved in a pair of other renewable energy projects Massachusetts elected officials have eyed as key steps to green the electric grid. The company owns half of the Vineyard Wind I project, which is slated to begin delivering power as the nation’s first utility-scale offshore wind farm in 2023, and is also working on a contentious New England Clean Energy Connect project in Maine that aims to connect to hydroelectric power generated in Maine.

Source:  by Chris Lisinski, State House News Service | December 16, 2022 | newbedfordlight.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon