LOCATION/TYPE

News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Gone with the wind: Lesotho’s $15-billion energy pipedream  

Credit:  Sechaba Mokhethi | 22 Sep 2022 | mg.co.za ~~

A $15-billion wind farm project that would have given Lesotho bragging rights to Africa’s largest renewable energy project, slashed electricity prices and created thousands of jobs has vanished from the country’s planned projects, leaving behind unanswered questions and politicians who don’t remember the details.

The project was designed to increase the local energy production from 73MW to 6 073MW, and would have meant the southern African country could stop importing expensive electricity from South Africa and Mozambique.

All traces of the project, which was conceived by the South African firm Harrison & White Investments and intended to be constructed in Mokhotlong district, have vanished. Politicians do not seem to have any explanation for this, or any knowledge that the government had a stake in the company earmarked for its construction.

Government collaboration

In 2011, Harrison & White Investments announced its collaboration with the Lesotho government on the $15-billion (then R110-billion) wind farm project, which would have been one of the largest of its kind in the world, according to IOL News.

Construction was to be undertaken by Breeze Power, a little-known consortium in Lesotho reportedly made up of 25% shares held by the Lesotho government and 75% by Harrison & White, Chinese and other foreign investors.

Reports at the time indicated the project would include 4 000 wind turbines in the highlands of the mountainous country.

However, no one seems willing to own up to knowing about the government’s alleged stake in Breeze Power – not even Monyane Moleleki, who was minister of natural resources at the time and was associated with Harris & White’s owners.

“It is my first time hearing that the government had a stake in Breeze Power … I never committed the government to this project,” Moleleki said in an interview.

The project appears to have ground to a halt when Moleleki left the ministry and was succeeded by Timothy Thahane, who became minister of energy in 2012 following the division of the ministry of natural resources into two parts.

Thahane now questions Breeze Power’s credentials, saying they were being promoted by Moleleki. “I only heard of Breeze Power and I know Moss [Leoka, the executive director] too, but when you look behind, there is no track record, no technical substance, just lies. They were fly-by-night and I could not waste my time with them,” he said.

Leoka, the executive director of both Harrison & White and Breeze Power, indicates that Moleleki’s role in the project was bigger than he is admitting.

“Harrison & White and the government had signed a Memorandum of Agreement [MoA]. Minister Moleleki had signed the MoA on behalf of the government. The signing of the MoA followed the project’s approval by the cabinet,” Leoka said in response to questions.

Although he could not share a copy of the MoA, Leoka said Breeze Power’s shareholders were “Harrison & White Investments with 90% shareholding and the government of Lesotho with 10% shareholding. The government had the option to acquire a further 15% stake in the project at a price to be mutually agreed on by the shareholders.”

Presented with these contradictions, Moleleki responded: “We might have had an MoA, but it’s not a contract. We are talking about things that happened 12 years ago and I can’t remember them.”

Wind turbines

Breeze Power was reported in 2011 to have signed an agreement with a Chinese technology partner, Ming Yang Wind Power, for the manufacture of wind turbine components to be made in factories in South Africa and Lesotho.

“We had chosen Ming Yang to be our partners due to their experience in developing wind power projects in the high mountains of north western China,” Leoka explained.

“We took two representatives from the Lesotho ministry of energy with us on a site visit to one of their projects high up the mountains. Sadly, a few months later they pulled out of the project.”

The Lesotho companies’ register records that Moya Eco Power, a South African firm, is the sole owner of Breeze Power. The register indicates Breeze Power was incorporated in Lesotho in July 2010, with its registered office listed as a room in one of the hotels in Maseru.

Asked to explain the discrepancy between the information on the MoA and that on Breeze Power’s registration records, Leoka said after new companies are registered it is not uncommon for some details to be changed later. “[For] example, when Breeze Power was registered, we had not yet appointed a board of directors, so a few names had to be used so that the company could be registered.”

Moleleki admits having had several meetings with Harrison & White representatives, but denies ever committing the government to the project.

In 2015 his party came back into power. The following year, a letter signed by Selibe Mochoboroane, who was the minister of energy at the time, was sent to R20 – Regions of Climate Action, a non-profit organisation that aims to bring together local authorities, technology providers and investors in their quest to promote renewable energy projects, introducing Breeze Power as the identified source of funding and also an engineering, procurement and construction contractor for this project.

Now the minister of development planning, responsible for approving all government projects, Selibe Mochoboroane said that the wind farm project is no longer in the government pipeline.

He said his signature on the letter to R20 might have been forged. Part of it reads: “We welcome R20’s initiative to work alongside governments … in accelerating the emergence of low-carbon climate-resilient infrastructure projects. We hereby mandate R20 to explore opportunities for the development of such projects within the Kingdom of Lesotho, specifically … wind farming.”

Mochoboroane said the signature “looks like mine. But one thing I am sure of is that I am not the one who wrote that letter, even if it was signed by myself. I am just so clueless about it. Maybe its proponents found a way to make me pass this letter on their behalf.”

Polluting energy

At the time the project was being planned, Moleleki in his capacity as minister of natural resources hailed the initiative, saying it would help Lesotho achieve “developing country status”.

“I was very enthusiastic about the project, so much so that I talked about it on the BBC,” he said in an interview.

He said South Africa has long supplied Lesotho with “what is probably the cheapest energy, yet very polluting”, and he had hoped to change that situation with this project by creating renewable green power and exporting it to South Africa.

“It was an exciting, mouth-watering prospect,” Moleleki added.

Moleleki said during the interview that for almost a year he had met Leoka on several occasions as a minister: “We met in Gauteng. They came to Lesotho Sun [Hotel] and to my office. He was a tall, very articulate and convincing gentleman … he was a likeable fellow.”

However, he said he had no knowledge about Breeze Power’s establishment despite his meetings with Leoka and vowed he had not committed the government to the consortium.

“Because, at the end of the day, the ministry of development planning was the one responsible for its approval,” he said.

Harrison & White

Lee-Ann Louverdis, a spokesperson for Breeze Power, told IOL News in 2011 the plan for Lesotho to build the world’s largest renewable energy project would be made up of 80% Chinese debt and 20% equity. Lesotho would contribute $250-million and Harrison & White would provide the balance, according to the report.

Investigations show that Leoka is also a shareholder of Harrison & White and he was at that time doubling as chief executive of Moya Eco Power in South Africa.

While it’s unclear what state Harrison & White’s finances were in at the time of the announcement, court records show that it started business rescue proceedings in 2013 and was finally liquidated in 2017.

“Up to the time that the project stopped, Harrison & White had spent over R40-million of its own money on the project,” Leoka said. “Beyond its role as a shareholder and contributor of the land, the government did not have much role to play.”

According to Moleleki, the topic of the project’s funding was never discussed during his tenure, despite the fact that reports in which he was interviewed at the time stated that the project’s main funding would be sourced from Chinese loans.

The office of public debt management, responsible for all loans taken by the Lesotho government, is in the dark about these reported plans.

“I don’t know anything about the wind farm project. Nothing has even been hinted at all,” said the director of public debt management, Khotso Moleleki, who is related to Monyane Moleleki.

He stressed that no government loan could be taken “without our involvement”.

All of this transpired ahead of the 2012 national elections, which Moleleki’s then-Democratic Congress party lost.

Moleleki now says he can’t remember his role in the meetings with Harris & White representatives, which stretched over more than six months. He also denies the statements about his involvement made by Breeze Power: “I was giving them moral support. I was excited about the project, but it fizzled away.”

Broke investor

After the Democratic Congress regained control of the government in 2015, Breeze Power noted on the companies’ register that it started business in March of that year doing electric power generation, transmission and distribution.

It was under this administration that the letter with Mochoboroane’s signature was written to the R20 secretariat introducing the wind farm project.

The same year that Mochoboroane allegedly introduced Breeze Power as a source of funding for the project, Harrison & White was already sinking in over R70-million debt and facing liquidation in South Africa.

According to court papers, this debt was made up of R55,031.90 owed to Cranes Direct CC; R55,404,291.57 owed to Firstrand Bank Limited; R15,337,921.21 owed to the South African Revenue Services; and R81,491.84 owed to Teemane Cranes (Pty) Ltd.

The liquidators’ report, as presented to the Benoni Magistrate’s Court on 21 February 2018, states that Harrison & White’s financial problems had started earlier and on 4 July 2013 the company started business rescue proceedings that were dependent on a substantial investment from an unnamed offshore investor that never materialised.

“What is clear is that the company [Harrison & White] invested in a number of projects in an attempt to broaden its business operations. Most of these projects were unsuccessful and resulted in additional pressure on the company’s cash resources,” noted the report.

According to Leoka, the project stalled when Harrison & White Investments was liquidated as the project depended on the company to fund it until signing a power purchase agreement with Eskom for the import of electricity from Lesotho.

“The unfortunate liquidation of Harrison & White happened just before the project could reach financial closure. Financial institutions and investors are typically averse to funding projects at the upstream stage. They prefer to come in post feasibility,” Leoka said.

“Developing a wind power project such as Breeze Power was a massive task, but it was not rocket science,” he said. “In the past 10 years, more than a dozen wind power projects have been developed in South Africa by local companies, none of which had any experience in this field. They didn’t need to have had any. They engaged engineering, procurement and construction contractors who had the requisite expertise to deliver their projects as going concerns.”

Power pipedream

Lesotho’s 72MW Muela Hydropower Plant has supplied only 60% of the country’s energy needs over the years, necessitating imports of the remaining 40% from non-renewable, coal-fired sources in South Africa and Mozambique.

The Lesotho Electricity Company says the landlocked country pays 10-times more to its neighbour than it pays for electricity from the local hydropower station, adding an additional cost for rural communities living on shoe-string budgets.

South Africa’s power utility Eskom was the intended recipient of power from the Lesotho wind project, according to reports at the time, although no agreement to purchase had been signed.

The Global Data report indicates that the project was envisaged to operate on 4 000 wind turbines that would be constructed in multiple phases over 10 to 15 years. It was anticipated that the farm would generate 6 000MW of wind power before 2021.

“The first phase includes a 150MW power plant, the second phase includes a 300MW power plant, and the third phase includes a 600MW power plant. Further phases of the project are not determined yet,” notes the report.

All this was just a pipedream as a recent visit to Mokhotlong revealed that the remote wind sensing masts, which Moleleki said were erected by Leoka’s company, were no longer there, allegedly vandalised and stolen.

The area principal chief, Qetho Sekonyela, said the residents knew only that the masts were used for wind energy testing, but he did not have further details as they were erected during the reign of his late father.

Sechaba Mokhethi is managing director of MNN Centre for Investigative Journalism in Lesotho. This investigation was completed with the support of the Oxpeckers Investigative Environmental Journalism #PowerTracker project and the Centre for Investigative Journalism’s Open Climate Reporting Initiative.

Source:  Sechaba Mokhethi | 22 Sep 2022 | mg.co.za

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: