[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

U.S. offshore wind plans collide with fishing concerns off Carolina coast  

Credit:  U.S. Offshore Wind Plans Collide With Fishing Concerns off Carolina Coast | By Jennifer Hiller and Katy Stech Ferek | The Wall Street Journal | May. 11, 2022 | www.wsj.com ~~

The Biden administration’s plans to develop wind power off the East Coast are drawing concerns from the fishing industry, in the latest example of climate policy colliding with the livelihood of coastal businesses.

The Interior Department is set Wednesday to begin an auction for the rights to develop a 110,000-acre site off the Carolinas. The site is nearly the size of eight Manhattan islands about 20 miles offshore and could generate more than 1.3 gigawatts of energy at full capacity within 10 years, enough to power half a million homes—roughly the population of Raleigh, N.C.

It is part of President Biden’s goal of bringing online 30 gigawatts of offshore wind power by 2030 in a bid to cut greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation. Sixteen bidders, including affiliates of Duke Energy Corp., Avangrid Inc., Ørsted A/S, Shell PLC and Invenergy LLC, have been cleared by U.S. officials to participate in the auction.

Commercial and recreational fishing businesses have raised concerns about the offshore projects, though the charter industry could see the biggest effects. Some areas up for bid are home to an ancient reef and old shipwrecks that support scores of species of fish popular with recreational anglers, including bluefin tuna, mackerel, snapper and grouper.

“It’s just our creme de la creme,” said Cane Faircloth, president of the North Carolina Captain For-Hire Association and a fifth-generation fisherman based in Holden, N.C. “I don’t understand why they picked that spot.”

Interior officials say they are aware of the concerns and are working on regulatory guidance that would lay out how wind farm developers can minimize harm to commercial and recreational fishing, while compensating businesses for losses.

Wednesday’s auction is moving forward before officials finish that work. More lease sales are planned in the next two years for regions off the coast of California, the central Atlantic region and in the Gulf of Mexico. The U.S. had seven offshore wind turbines installed as of 2021, compared with 5,852 in Europe, according to the Global Wind Energy Council industry group.

Without federal guidance, offshore wind developers have carved out their own settlements with local fishing groups.

Developers behind the $2.8 billion Vineyard Wind project off the Massachusetts coast, scheduled to begin operating next year, made roughly $40 million available for the industry. In permitting documents, they said they expect commercial fishing businesses to abandon the 75,000-acre area because it will be too hard to navigate. They projected the industry’s income loss at $14 million over 30 years.

Glenn Skinner, executive director of the North Carolina Fisheries Association, which represents commercial and recreational charter businesses, said his members could have to take longer trips to avoid the wind farms, raising fuel costs, or end up with lighter catches and fewer customers because fish are less abundant.

“How do you compensate folks who have worked out there all their life, especially the recreational charter-for-hire industry?” he said.

The American Clean Power Association, a Washington, D.C., trade group that represents the wind, solar and electricity storage industries, has said that compensation for fisheries should cover navigation system upgrades, new fishing boats or other gear, but the funds should come from money raised from the government’s lease sales or other operating fees.

“Saddling project proponents with the costs of fisheries compensation would almost certainly have an adverse impact on ratepayers and/or project finance,” association officials said in a January letter to U.S. officials.

A February sale of offshore wind parcels near New York and New Jersey generated a record $4.37 billion, but the Carolinas auction is unlikely to climb as high, said Timothy Fox, vice president and research analyst at research company ClearView Energy Partners LLC. Unlike those states, North Carolina hasn’t set explicit targets for purchasing offshore wind power. Wind speeds are also weaker near southern Atlantic states.

The auction beginning this week could be the last in the region for some time. On July 1, a 10-year moratorium on new offshore wind lease sales put in place by former President Donald Trump will take effect in regions off North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida.

The moratorium is based on a federal law that empowers the president to pull unleased land from energy developers’ reach, an authority former President Barack Obama used to block areas off Alaska’s coast from oil and gas drilling. Industry and legal experts say another president cannot undo the action, though Congress can.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers and other industry groups are pushing lawmakers to do just that in a bill aimed at boosting U.S. competitiveness with China, but that legislation’s fate and content are uncertain.

“When you think about how quickly and substantial this industry changes, 10 years is a really long time in the world of energy,” said Katharine Kollins, president of the Southeastern Wind Coalition.

Source:  U.S. Offshore Wind Plans Collide With Fishing Concerns off Carolina Coast | By Jennifer Hiller and Katy Stech Ferek | The Wall Street Journal | May. 11, 2022 | www.wsj.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: