[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Suffolk wind farm could derail No 10’s energy strategy 

Credit:  A Cabinet row is brewing over the decision to approve two controversial offshore turbine projects | By Tony Diver, Whitehall Correspondent | The Telegraph | 27 March 2022 | www.telegraph.co.uk ~~

Boris Johnson’s energy security strategy risks being derailed by a Cabinet row this week over the decision to approve two controversial wind farms off the Suffolk coast.

Kwasi Kwarteng, the Business Secretary, has until Thursday to decide whether to approve East Anglia One North and East Anglia Two, which between them could generate 1600Mw of electricity – enough to power 1.2 million homes.

The developments are opposed by Therese Coffey, the Work and Pensions Secretary, who represents the Suffolk coastal constituency closest to where the turbines would be constructed.

A local campaign group has sprung up in the medieval village of Friston, where Scottish Power proposes to build two eight-acre substations to receive the electricity generated by the farms.

Residents say the substations and the underground cables that would connect them to the farms would disrupt the historic village and have proposed that the substation be built in Bradwell-on-Sea, a village in Essex represented by John Whittingdale, the former culture minister.
Fears for endangered birds

The RSPB has also raised concerns about the threat to red-throated divers, a protected species of bird that is known to avoid wind turbines.

A similar project for 65 turbines in the Thames Estuary was abandoned in 2014 amid concerns about the birds.

The local campaign against East Anglia One North and East Anglia Two has the support of Ms Coffey, who has urged Mr Kwarteng to keep the onshore elements of the wind farms away from her constituents.

A source close to her said: “Therese continues to be a strong supporter of the principle of offshore wind farms but she has concerns about the implementation of the proposed onshore infrastructure for these projects.

“There is a more sensible location at Bradwell in Essex and she will continue to push for this option to be considered.”

A spokesman for the Business Secretary declined to comment on the projects, but the decision on their construction comes in the same week that Mr Johnson plans to release his energy security strategy, which is designed to wean the UK off its “addiction” to imported hydrocarbons.

The Prime Minister is a backer of offshore wind, and is also expected to expand government support for more controversial onshore projects.

The strategy is expected to focus on nuclear energy and wind power as two potential solutions to the UK’s reliance on imported energy, and announce a raft of measures to remove barriers to investment in the sector.

It could include reforms to planning laws to reduce residents’ ability to resist new energy developments, and incentives for major investors to inject cash into new projects.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  A Cabinet row is brewing over the decision to approve two controversial offshore turbine projects | By Tony Diver, Whitehall Correspondent | The Telegraph | 27 March 2022 | www.telegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky