[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Updated: Enel sues county, zoning administrator  

Credit:  By Gordon Woods | Clinton Journal | Aug 12, 2021 | theclintonjournal.com ~~

CLINTON – Enel Green Energy, on Wednesday, filed suit in DeWitt County against the county and the county’s zoning administrator.

Online circuit court records show Enel filed for miscellaneous remedy against the plaintiffs listed as “DeWitt County” and “DeWitt County Zoning Administrator.” County board administrative assistant Dee Rentmeister has been serving as temporary zoning administrator pending hiring of a new zoning official. The county’s full-time zoning administrator resigned unexpectedly earlier this summer.

Enel is suing after the county board, in July, voted to suspend issuance of building permits for the Alta Farms II wind energy project.

A majority of board members voted July 22 to suspend further building permits for the Alta Farms II project until its developer Enel Green Energy can prove it would be able to curtail the turbines during periods of severe weather.

The procedure known as “curtailment” involves slowing or stopping the rotation of wind turbine blades. This is believed to reduce potential interference with DOPLAR weather radar used in tracking major storms and tornadoes.

During the county’s land use committee meeting August 9, committee chairman and board chairman Terry Ferguson advised not pushing the issue about building permits. Enel filed its suit two days later.

In its suit, Alta Farms asks the court to order the county and Rentmeister, as acting zoning administrator, to immediately issue 15 building permits for a series of wind turbines identified by number in the court documents. Alta Farms further asserts there is “no legal or factual basis” for the county refusing to issue the permits.

The Alta Farms filing states the company’s applications for the building permits complied with the requirements of the county’s zoning ordinance, its wind energy ordinance and Special Use Permit (SUP) ordinance. The suit claims, too, that any use by the county of drainage district laws to deny the permits has “no legal basis.”

Alta Farms also is claiming “substantial damages” caused by construction delays.

There has been some question by residents attending the county’s meetings whether the board usurped the zoning administrator’s authority by suspending Enel’s building permits.

Source:  By Gordon Woods | Clinton Journal | Aug 12, 2021 | theclintonjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: