[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Reineke: SB 52 would give communities more say on green energy projects  

Credit:  Gere Goble | Bucyrus Telegraph-Forum | Jun. 3, 2021 | www.bucyrustelegraphforum.com ~~

COLUMBUS – Legislation designed to give communities more control over the development of wind and solar energy projects has been approved by the Ohio Senate.

Senate Bill 52, which was co-sponsored by Bill Reineke, R-Tiffin, was passed by the Senate on Wednesday by a vote of 20-13, and now moves on to the Ohio House of Representatives, according to the Senate’s website. The legislation would then need the signature of Gov. Mike DeWine.

“The bill has gone through many revisions, trying to make it satisfactory to all of the different interested parties, so I am satisfied that we have gotten some kind of local control involved with these projects,” said Reineke, who represents Ohio’s 26th District. “We are interested in promoting development, but also interested in making sure that our local citizens know what’s happening in their own back yards.

“My objection was to bring control to the local level, and we were trying to get it to township level, and we have it at the county level.”

Honey Creek Wind Farm planned in county

Apex Clean Energy is developing the Honey Creek Wind Farm Project in northern Crawford County and southern Seneca County. The actual height, number and location of wind turbines has not been determined, but a company representative has said it’s anticipated the project will use about 75 turbines, each 600 to 650 feet tall (measured to the tip of the blade). Apex representatives could not be reached for comment Thursday.

The Honey Creek plan faces opposition from the Seneca-Crawford Anti-Wind Alliance.

Under current legislation, developers of clean energy projects apply to the Ohio Power Siting Board for operating permits.

The new legislation would give county commissioners the power to designate energy development districts – essentially, a form of zoning – explained Joe Cicchillo, Reneike’s senior legislative aide. They also would be able to designate whether the zone was open to wind, solar or both. The new law would require all new wind or solar projects to be within such a zone.

If a project is not entirely within an energy development district, the Ohio Power Siting Board would have to reject the permit application as incomplete.

“There’s no need for a specific project before a zone is created,” Cicchillo said; counties could designate an energy development district in an effort to attract such projects.

“You’ll probably also see the other situation, where the developer will approach a county and say ‘Hey, we’re looking to develop a project, would you consider making an energy zone district in this area?'” he said.

Commissioners can’t block a specific project

The legislation does not give commissioners the ability to block a specific project once the energy development district has been created, Cicchillo said, but they can resize the district or ask the developer to make changes.

The legislation also gives opponents a 30-day window after commissioners approve an energy development districts to file a referendum petition, putting the issue on the ballot in a special election, he said – adding that’s in line with other laws governing zoning. The bill does not allow a referendum on a specific project.

If the Senate Bill 52 is signed into law, it would go into effect 90 days later. It would apply to any projects in the development process that had not yet been deemed “complete and accepted” by the Ohio Power Siting Board, Cicchillo said. “Any project that had not yet reached that point would be subject to this bill,” he said.

Developers would be required to have a a public meeting at least 90 days before filing an application with the Ohio Power Siting Board. At that meeting, all details about the planned development would be shared.

For the purpose of considering such an application, the siting board would be supplemented by two ad hoc members, representing the county and the township where the facility would be built. In cases where multiple townships or counties are involved, they would select a representative.

The legislation also would give commissioners the ability to adopt a resolution barring the development of any major wind farms or solar facilities in the county.

Source:  Gere Goble | Bucyrus Telegraph-Forum | Jun. 3, 2021 | www.bucyrustelegraphforum.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: