[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Offshore wind pushes West without fisheries input, stakeholders say 

Credit:  By Jessica Hathaway | National Fisherman | May 27, 2021 | www.nationalfisherman.com ~~

The Interior Department announced on Tuesday, May 25, that two areas off the California coast would be targeted for wind energy projects, including a nearly 400-square-mile wind farm in Morro Bay.

“The offshore wind industry has the potential to create tens of thousands of good-paying union jobs across the nation, while combating the negative effects of climate change,” U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said in a press release.

Commercial fishermen on both coasts continue to be concerned about what the federal push for offshore wind projects means for their jobs. Fishing groups say their feedback has largely been ignored.

“The fishing industry has been told these areas work best for offshore wind developers; but no one
has asked us what areas would work best for us,” said Mike Conroy, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Association, in a statement released on Tuesday.

Conroy has been active in the commercial fishing industry’s efforts to provide input on East Coast project proposals. He had been hoping for more time to prepare for the federal government’s plans to move forward with West Coast offshore wind energy projects.

Conroy noted that the government has not engaged with fishermen nor conducted fisheries data or spatial planning prior to this announcement, and that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s California task force meeting scheduled for June 24 is poorly timed, as it coincides with the start of the next Pacific Fishery Management Council meeting.

“It is inexcusable that BOEM, who has claimed to engage closely with the council, would schedule a task force meeting during the council’s meeting,” Conroy said. “The fishing community will now have to choose between attending the council meeting and participating in discussions fostering our sustainable fisheries or attending a meeting where they will be told that dire consequences are possible for the fisheries the council manages.”

For stakeholders long participating in the public process on offshore wind investments, this conflict is par for the course.

“Fishermen have shown up for years to ‘engage’ in processes where spatial constraints and, often, the actors themselves are opposed to their livelihood,” according to a letter the Responsible Offshore Development Alliance submitted to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s New York Bight task force, stating it would boycott the meetings in protest.

“This time and effort has resulted in effectively no accommodations to mitigate impacts from individual developers or the supposedly unbiased federal and state governments,” the letter says. “Individuals from the fishing community care deeply, but the deck is so stacked that they are exhausted and even traumatized by this relentless assault on their worth and expertise.”

The federal government claims that, if built as planned, the California projects will generate up to 4.6 gigawatts of energy, enough to power 1.6 million homes.

Conroy’s statement said the PCFFA has concerns about what wind turbines may do to marine ecosystems, as well as what construction of the massive machines may do for fishing stocks.

“Far too many questions remain unanswered regarding potential impacts to marine life, which is dependent on a healthy ecosystem,” he said.

Source:  By Jessica Hathaway | National Fisherman | May 27, 2021 | www.nationalfisherman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky