[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Senate bill allows local referendum on solar, wind projects  

Credit:  By Andy Chow | Statehouse News Bureau | May 25, 2021 | www.statenews.org ~~

Republican lawmakers are making changes to a bill that seeks to give local voters the power to reject a renewable energy project in their neighborhood. Ohio Senators say they’re trying to strike a balance between local control and economic development.

The Senate bill, SB52, gives county officials and voters more authority to oppose or even hold a referendum on a proposed solar or wind energy project.

Jeremy Kitson is from Van Wert County, home to Ohio’s largest wind farm. He says this gives local residents a voice.

“To say that we have been ignored would be an understatement. This bill allows a compromise which we feel we can live with. We just want more transparency with developers up front and a more vital and meaningful say about development in our community,” Kitson told the Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee.

But environmental groups, renewable energy developers, and business groups says the bill goes too far, hampering clean energy and economic development.

“No developer will spend millions of dollars to go through the extensive power siting process if a small township vote could put an end to their project even after it has been approved by the state,” said Cathy Cowan Becker, executive director of “Simply Living” as part of the Ohio Sustainable Business Council.

Republican sponsors say they’ve been working with the business groups to address concerns.

On Tuesday, Sen. Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) introduced a revised version of the bill that made changes to the previous language on the process to oppose a project.

“In my view it strikes a significant balance early on enough, as far as whether a project would proceed or not, but it also gives the locals a meaningful seat at the table in the OPSB (Ohio Power Siting Board) process to be able to address some of their concerns,” McColley said.

The committee has scheduled a possible vote on the bill but decided to give legislators and interested parties more time to look over the new language.

Source:  By Andy Chow | Statehouse News Bureau | May 25, 2021 | www.statenews.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: