[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Turbines too close  

Credit:  Letters | The SandPaper | May 12, 2021 | www.thesandpaper.net ~~

The following was addressed to Gov. Phil Murphy.

Dear Gov. Murphy:

I am a resident of LBI and a registered professional engineer. My career has been devoted to the evaluation and implementation of renewable energy projects. I have written this letter because I am concerned about the significant visual impacts and the potential for negative effects on tourism, the local economy, the fishing industry and the environment resulting from the offshore wind complex proposed by Atlantic Shores.

Times have changed since the site was leased to Atlantic Shores just five years ago. Wind turbines are much larger and taller, more visible and can be constructed in deeper water. Visual impacts have gained recognition as a major concern regarding wind energy development. The federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management just last month withdrew two wind energy areas (WEAs) off Long Island, partially due to their closeness to the shore and related visual impacts. The two areas withdrawn were 15 miles offshore.

The Atlantic Shores project off LBI is just 9 to 10 miles offshore. If we apply the same minimum distance criteria in New Jersey as New York state does (20 miles, as reported in the New York Offshore Wind Master Plan), that would eliminate or severely restrict the Atlantic Shores site. Since that policy was put in place, the BOEM has set a minimum limit of 17.3 miles for the New York Bight WEAs.

By this New York example, a state can influence federal decision making. I urge you to have the state conduct the necessary studies to recognize the changes in offshore wind development and to put in place policy to establish an exclusion zone for New Jersey protective of affected communities.

The visual impacts from the Atlantic Shores project would create an industrial setting, a wall of several hundred turbines readily visible from the beaches in Barnegat Light to Holgate. The project would put the Jersey Shore, not only LBI, at risk. Our view, as many have said here, is akin to that of the Grand Canyon: unobstructed and beautiful. There are not many places in New Jersey where the natural resources are so significant, drawing millions each year to visit.

When considering visual impacts, New York in its Offshore Wind Master Plan stated that “the State set a minimum distance of 20 miles for the Area of Consideration in order to ensure that, for the vast majority of the time, turbines would have no discernible or visible impact for a casual viewer on the shore.” The Visibility Threshold Study (NYSERDA Report 17-25s, December 2017, which was the basis for the master plan threshold) focused on smaller turbines (8 megawatts) as compared to the 12MW turbines likely for the projects off New Jersey.

Twenty miles, as a minimum standard, is not likely far enough offshore for the proposed Atlantic Shores project with these larger turbines. Let’s do the studies and put in place an exclusion zone to protect the Jersey Shore, further allowing the state to effectively influence federal decisions. Perhaps that can best be done by an update to the state’s energy master plan.

Jim Binder

Surf City

Source:  Letters | The SandPaper | May 12, 2021 | www.thesandpaper.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: