[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Bid for North Lowther windfarm scheme in Dumfries and Galloway could be subject of judicial review  

Credit:  By Tracy Carmichael | Daily Record | 9 Apr 2021 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk ~~

A legal challenge is set to be the fresh twist in a controversial windfarm saga stretching back to 2017.

The company behind the North Lowther scheme is mounting a court bid for judicial review of Scottish Ministers’ reasoning in refusing the proposal in January.

Original plans tabled in 2017 earmarked the site north-west of Wanlockhead and close to the northern ridge of the scenic Mennock Pass for 35 wind turbines towering up to 149 metres in height.

But the bid, revised in 2018, was downgraded to seek permission for 30 turbines on land belonging to the Duke of Buccleuch’s estate.

It had met with opposition from the communities of Leadhills and Wanlockhead and from a host of organisations with a vested interest.

The divisive plan resulted in a public inquiry in 2019 in a bid to help determine the application.

But German-owned renewables specialist BayWa.r.e, who are behind the development, have confirmed they will take their fight to the Court of Session to seek judicial review of the decision.

The company’s managing director, Gordon MacDougall, confirmed the move.

He said: “We have lodged a petition seeking a judicial review of the decision on the NLEI application.

“There is a well-established right for parties to seek a judicial review of decisions of this nature. As we are now in a legal process we do not wish to comment further on the details of the case.”

The company had earlier admitted being “disappointed” by January’s ministerial decision.

Judicial review is designed to examine the lawfulness of a decision or action taken by a public body and ensure they are acting within their powers.

Bodies including Dumfries and Galloway Council, South Lanarkshire Council and Lowther Hills Ski Club were amongst those who lodged opposition to the windfarm.

National Air Traffic Safeguarding also opposed the proposal on the grounds that it would have an “unacceptable impact” on Prestwick airport and on radars located at Lowther and Cumbernauld.

Sanquhar Community Council backed the plan and there were a total of 106 public representations supporting the windfarm.

However, Scottish Ministers vetoed it, ruling that it would “give rise to unacceptable significant adverse landscape and visual impacts as well as adversely impact on the historic setting of Wanlockhead”.

They backed the planning reporter’s verdict that benefits offered by the construction would be “outweighed” by the adverse effects on “the natural beauty of the area”.

Applicants the North Lowther Energy Initiative, a partnership originally between Buccleuch Estates and 2020 Renewables, said the £200 million scheme would create 40 jobs, as well as generating up to £735,000 a year for communities.

Buccleuch Estates no longer has any role in the process.

Benny Higgins, executive chairman of Buccleuch, said: “Buccleuch was formerly a partner in a joint venture to develop the North Lowther Energy Initiative but that arrangement ended in 2019.

“Should the scheme ultimately go ahead, the turbines would be situated on Buccleuch land for which our business would receive a ground rent.”

Source:  By Tracy Carmichael | Daily Record | 9 Apr 2021 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: