LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State regulators want a look-back at results from Crowned Ridge wind project’s sound study 

Credit:  Bob Mercer | KELO | Apr 5, 2021 | www.keloland.com ~~

A facility to turn wind into electricity in northeastern South Dakota that state regulators permitted in 2019 must do another study this fall on how much sound from its 87 turbines can be heard at several homes in the project area.

The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission ordered Crowned Ridge in Grant and Codington counties to take a second look.

The decision comes after an outside consultant for the commission reviewed the company’s results from last fall at six locations.

He determined that three of the test sites were 100% within maximum levels the commission set in the project’s permit but three others exceeded levels 4% of the time during the three-week test.

The commissioners last week told the project’s developer to run a second test this fall at the three sites that were out of compliance and at a fourth location.

“We may or may not be done with this issue. We don’t know,” commission chairman Chris Nelson said.

He said NextEra Energy presented “a reasonable plan” to follow up, adopted software to reduce noise and had agreements with at least two of the affected landowners.

“That remains to be seen whether additional action needs to be taken,” Nelson said.

Attorneys Miles Schumacher of Sioux Falls and Brian Murphy for the Florida-based developer wanted commissioners to agree that the commission wouldn’t take any additional action regarding the exceedances, other than requiring the follow-up.

Commission attorney Karen Cremer said their request wasn’t surprising. “You might as well as shoot for it and you get what you get,” she said.

Source:  Bob Mercer | KELO | Apr 5, 2021 | www.keloland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon