[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm developer withdraws permit requests with DEP 

Credit:  Published March 24. 2021 | www.tnonline.com ~~

Broad Mountain Power LLC, the firm that wants to build a wind project on the Broad Mountain in Packer Township and Nesquehoning Borough, has withdrawn two applications it had before the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

The action comes three months after the Packer Township Zoning Hearing Board on Dec. 22, by unanimous vote, denied the firm’s request for a special exception permit and also for three variances. That decision came after more than 20 hearings in the multiyear dispute.

In a letter dated March 22, Carl J. DeLuca, Acting Program Manager, Waterways and Wetlands Program of the DEP, confirmed Broad Mountain Power’s withdrawals for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits within the two municipalities, saying no further action will be taken on the requests by the department.

DeLuca said in a letter to the applicant it will notify the Carbon County Conservation District, the two municipalities and two environmental firms of the withdrawals.

In denying the company’s request for the special exception permit and three variances of the township’s zoning laws, the zoning hearing board said the main reason for rejecting the developer’s requests is the board did not believe some of the testimony of experts during the hearings.

Among the board members’ concerns were the wind turbines would emit sounds louder than the rules allow – particularly the 16 turbines that reach 656 feet tall (of 21 turbines, total).

Board members also said they felt a case was made that the wind farm would reduce property values.

Source:  Published March 24. 2021 | www.tnonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon