[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind firm tries to change rules again  

Credit:  Joni Riggle | Observer | Mar 20, 2021 | ~~

I am writing in response to a recent Post-Journal and Observer article regarding the Cassadaga Wind Project. Owner RWE claims, “Local support for the project remains strong.” I do not believe our local bats, eagles, raptors, songbirds, most living creatures or most turbine neighbors agree with RWE.

Residents within one mile of the wind project recently received a mailer giving instructions on how to register a complaint with Cassadaga Wind once the project is operational. The letter did not state why residents will likely be putting the complaint hotline on speed dial.

Please note: Cassadaga Wind has petitioned the state Siting Board to alter sound testing protocol and compliance requirements as ordered in the Certificate. Cassadaga Wind seeks to eliminate testing, to verify compliance with Certificate condition 80(b), the World Health Organization’s health standard, an annual nighttime noise limit of 40 dBA. Cassadaga Wind and it German parent company – net worth billions of dollars – claim it is too time consuming and costly to perform the testing they agreed upon as a condition of Certification.

In their revised Sound Monitoring Protocol, Cassadaga Wind has actually redefined “ON” to mean “Off” during compliance sound testing. I quote,“Without this clarification the protocol could be interpreted to mean that ON means all turbines must be turned on and operating at full power. … However, our modification to the Protocol allows for wind turbines to be OFF no matter how much that turbine contributes to the overall sound level, so long as it is part of “normal operations.” They obfuscate the meaning of “normal operations” to include shutdowns for bat curtailment, shadow flicker and wake interference; all totally avoidable testing times.

The complaint resolution protocol, should be renamed the Non-Resolution Protocol. As written, it will exclude the vast majority of resident noise complaints from being eligible for sound testing. Only those few residents modeled in Cassadaga Winds’ pre-construction guesstimate/ analysis to receive over 40 dBA, will be eligible for testing and then only once every five years.

Tragically, the state’s captured agencies are allowing the fox to guard the henhouse and allow developers to write the rules at our expense. Adding insult to injury, Cassadaga Wind’s Power Purchase Agreements, which includes the Renewable Energy Credits, are not even with New York but with New England.

Joni Riggle is a Sinclairville resident.

Source:  Joni Riggle | Observer | Mar 20, 2021 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: