[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County council discusses wind farm provisions in proposed new land-use bylaw 

Credit:  Stephen Tipper | The Vulcan Advocate | Feb 02, 2021 | www.vulcanadvocate.com ~~

Vulcan County council carried first reading of its proposed new land-use bylaw (LUB), which has been in the works for several years.

And provisions regarding wind farms featured during council’s discussions Jan. 27.

Following the Dec. 16 public hearing, the land-use bylaw committee, which includes two councillors, reviewed the document and made some changes to the proposed LUB, said Ryan Dyck, a planner with the Oldman River Regional Services Commission.

Dyck noted that setbacks to dwelling units from a turbine, situated within a wind farm project, were increased to a minimum distance of 300 metres, and setbacks to residents from a turbine outside a wind farm project were reintroduced, being set at a minimum distance of 800 metres.

“I think what we have here represents a balance, a response to landowner concerns,” said Dyck, adding the wind power section in the land-use bylaw provides information on the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) rules as well as setting out the County’s own rules.

Dyck noted the sound requirement in the existing draft was set at 45 decibels.

The particular section of the draft land-use bylaw covering noise levels from wind-energy conversion systems (WECS) reads: “At no time shall the cumulative modelled sound level of a multi-WECS measured at the wind farm project boundary (including all titled parcels participating in the project) exceed 45dBa unless an easement, as approved by the Development Authority, is agreed to by the affected land owner and registered on the affected title.”

Dyck said there wasn’t much attention paid to that provision when the draft LUB was circulated.

Coun. Michael Monner expressed concerned about the sound levels.

“For me, you purchase a property and you have the quiet enjoyment … and somebody else comes in and disturbs that,” said Monner. “I feel it’s an affront to our rights.”

Monner said the 45-decibel requirement should be reduced, even with an 800-metre setback.

“I would rather on a little tighter sound level than just going with the standard norm,” he said.

Dyck noted the AUC sets a daytime decibel level as well as a lower nighttime decibel level, but cautioned against getting too technical in the land-use bylaw.

“I would leery about getting into too much detail with this because I think it implies that a, we understand it better than maybe we do and b, that there’s this redundancy that we’re dealing with the same matter,” said Dyck.

Reeve Jason Schneider said council needs to come up with a standard that’s “fair across the board.”

The consensus of council was to change the decibel level to 40.

Coun. Shane Cockwill, who chairs the County’s planning commission, said the overwhelming feedback he received was a request to maintain the setback standards.

“It addresses some reasonable concerns, and so I appreciate that the previous standard was maintained,” said Cockwill.

Schneider said he “likes what we’ve got” in the new land-use bylaw regarding wind farm projects.

“My initial argument was that I want this new bylaw to be very clear so that we weren’t giving a false impression to anybody that the County was able to overrule the Alberta Utilities Commission,” said the reeve.

Anne Erickson, the County’s manager of development services, said she appreciates the value of having the setbacks in place, so that those standards can be passed along to potential developers.

Coun. Doug Logan, who remotely attended the Jan. 27 council meeting, declared a pecuniary interest and did not participate in the discussion or vote on the first reading of the land-use bylaw.

Another public hearing on the land-use bylaw takes place on Feb. 10, after which council could consider giving the bylaw second and third readings.

Source:  Stephen Tipper | The Vulcan Advocate | Feb 02, 2021 | www.vulcanadvocate.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon