[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bloomer Township Board tables wind/solar ordinance vote  

Credit:  By Elisabeth Waldon | Daily News | January 23, 2021 | thedailynews.cc ~~

BLOOMER TOWNSHIP – The Bloomer Township Board was set to vote on a wind energy ordinance Monday as recommended by its Planning Commission, but they voted instead to table it for another month.

The Township Board met for its regular monthly meeting via Zoom. Besides township officials and the Daily News, no other audience members were present.

The township’s Planning Commission previously held a public hearing in August 2020 regarding solar and wind energy zoning ordinance amendments, which was then recommended to the township board (you can read the full proposed ordinance here: Bloomer Twp ordinance).

On Monday, Township Board Trustee Tara Chapko made a motion to approve the ordinance as recommended.

“Based on what the Planning Commission has done and the paperwork written up from the lawyer, I would recommend we go ahead and implement that ordinance,” Chapko said.

However, Trustee Larry Hummel had some concerns, referencing a federal lawsuit involving Gratiot County’s North Shade Township and its own wind energy ordinance language. (After Monday’s meeting, the Daily News told Hummel there was no federal lawsuit involving North Shade Township and asked if Hummel might be referring to a lawsuit brought by NextEra Energy Resources against Tuscola County’s Almer Township in 2017, which Hummel confirmed.)

“I’ve asked this question for a couple months now … based on what we heard about happening in November in North Shade Township, my only concern was that our attorney reviewed those couple of items that cause them a problem and cost them a lot of legal fees that they ultimately ended up winning,” Hummel said during Monday’s meeting. “The two items from North Shade had to do with the 2,000 foot setback from a property, the shadow flicker language and the decibel language.

“If it happened with somebody very close by, it couldn’t hurt us to have our attorney say yea or nay, it’s fine or we shouldn’t approve it,” he said. “I don’t think our attorney has answered those questions yet, have they?”

Chapko then withdrew her motion and Hummel made a motion to contact the Bloomer Township attorney regarding the proposed wind ordinance to make sure the shadow flicker language, the distance from property line language and the decibel language protected the township.

That motion passed in a 4-0 vote with Chapko, Hummel, Clerk Sharon Miller and Treasurer Colleen Schneider all voting “yes.” Supervisor Dan Ryan was absent from Monday’s meeting.

“Ultimately there will be an ordinance and it will pass, I’m quite certain,” Hummel said.

According to the Huron Daily Tribune, NextEra sued Almer Township after that township’s Planning Commission enacted a moratorium for more time to make a decision and review their renewable energy ordinances. While the court case was pending, township officials made some changes to their ordinances, including to turbine setbacks. NextEra’s lawsuit against the township was dismissed by a federal judge in 2018.

The Daily News contacted North Shade Township Supervisor John Peck to ask him how the Gratiot Wind Farms Project in Gratiot County’s North Shade Township near Montcalm County’s Bloomer Township was going. The 60-turbine project was created by Enel Green Power North America, was acquired by Consumers Energy and went into action in late 2020.

Peck said the wind farm is going well as far as the township is concerned, but he added that personally the wind farm has caused some unpleasant issues for him involving anti-wind activists.

“I’ve gotten hollered at by people coming into our township who are upset that it’s being put up,” he said. “These people aren’t even from our township. It’s quite interesting.”

Source:  By Elisabeth Waldon | Daily News | January 23, 2021 | thedailynews.cc

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.