[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Could the outcome of Tuesday’s election change DeWitt County’s $300 million wind farm plan? 

Credit:  Kevin Barlow | The Pantagraph | www.pantagraph.com ~~

CLINTON – The DeWitt County Board will have a new look when it reorganizes next month – and that could spell some trouble for the recently approved Alta Farms II wind farm project.

The $300 million project was approved 6-5 in July, with one board member, Cole Ritter, not attending the meeting because of a conflict of interest with the project.

Ritter lost his bid to retain his seat in the March primary, finishing last in a four-person race for three spots on the ballot. On Tuesday, his seat and three others were filled by newcomers, each endorsed by opponents of the wind farm and running on platforms against the project.

During construction of the wind farm slated for completion next year, a number of conditions and plans must still be approved by the full board, which now includes Aaron Kammeyer, Buck Carter, Jamie Prestegaard, and Megan Myers. Scott Nimmo, Camille Redman and Lance Reece, who all voted in favor of the project in July, will lose their seats.

“I think the residents have sent a resounding vote of no confidence in how the board has currently conducted business as it relates to this wind project in the last two general elections,” Kammeyer said. “It’s time we start to listen to our constituents as a whole and act as servant leaders of our residents. We need to ensure that not only is the economic opportunities for the county a factor in our decision, but we are also considering our residents safety, that our first responders are trained to deal with issues pertaining to the wind farm, and that the county is not left with a financial burden long after the wind farm development is over.”

“The citizens of DeWitt County overwhelmingly voted to bring change to the County Board,” said Andrea Rhoades, a DeWitt County resident and vocal opponent of the wind farm. “The incumbents could not hide from how they ignored the best interest of their constituents or their blatant disregard of their own zoning ordinances by approving the Alta II wind farm special use permit.”

Representatives from Enel Energy, owners of the wind farm, declined comment.

Each turbine must have a building permit. Building permits are not approved by the county board though; only by the zoning officer. These permits must also have all the necessary information as required by the conditions of the special use permit.

The vote in July reversed an earlier decision by the board, which voted 6-5 with one abstention to deny the special use permit for the project in April 2019. Board members cited the application was incomplete. The developers re-submitted an application, but still drew the same criticism.

“It was and is still an incomplete application and should not have been moved forward by the present board,” Carter said.

Board Chairman Dave Newberg retained his seat, but is likely to face a challenge for the chairman’s seat when the board re-organizes next month.

The board and the wind farm developers also face a challenge in the courts. So far, two lawsuits have been filed, including one by the Village of Wapella seeking an injunction to stop the construction of the project, and the other by opponents of the project. Court dates have not yet been set.

“I am in agreement with our advisory boards that the special use permit application submitted by the developer does not meet the requirements set forth in our wind ordinance and feel it should not have been approved,” Myers said. “How we move ahead may be determined by the pending litigation.”

Prestegaard agree that pending litigation may determine the next steps of the Alta II Farms wind project.

“The passing of an incomplete special use permit application back in July sends a message to others that our county’s ordinances do not need to be strictly followed,” he said.

Source:  Kevin Barlow | The Pantagraph | www.pantagraph.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky