[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Rocky Forge: The wrong place  

Credit:  Letter | The Roanoke Times | August 26, 2020 | roanoke.com ~~

One 450-foot, steel wind turbine requires anchoring in a platform of more than a thousand tons of concrete and steel rebar, 30 to 50 feet across and anywhere from 6 to 30 feet deep. Mountain tops must be blasted to create a level area of at least 3 acres for each turbine. Rocky Forge will build up to 22 wind turbines 680 feet high.

Bigger blades on a taller tower can capture more wind to run a bigger generator, but they require a correspondingly larger foundation and an area around them clear of trees and other turbines to maximize the effect of the wind and avoid interference.

In addition to mountain top removal that will occur from the installation of these turbines, the many mountain streams and wetlands and the life they support will be destroyed and the resulting erosion and sediment from stormwater will be deposited in the James River.

After water, concrete is the most widely used substance on earth. If cement were a country, it would be the third largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the world – 2.8 billion tons/year – surpassed only by China and the US. In production, it also sucks up almost one-tenth of the world’s industrial water use, all the while destroying the natural infrastructure and ecological function that humanity depends on for providing soil fertilization, flood control, water purification and habitat biodiversity.

Wind turbines can play an important part in our transition from gas and oil; however, Rocky Forge is not appropriate environmentally for North Mountain and is not cost effective from any other aspect of the project from construction, transportation, installation, production, decommissioning, to recovery. Mitigation for the problems this project faces is not an even trade and does not prevent the destruction of an irreplaceable healthy forest already sequestering carbon.

We need to be more practical and careful by using our dollars to support projects that will actually provide cost-effective, reliable energy use. Rocky Forge cannot meet that goal.

SANDRA W. STUART

ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY

Source:  Letter | The Roanoke Times | August 26, 2020 | roanoke.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: