[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ministers reject bid to expand 48-turbine wind farm near Lauder by quarter  

Credit:  Plans to expand a controversial wind farm near Lauder already made up of almost 50 turbines have been rejected | By Darin Hutson | The Southern Reporter | Friday, 3rd July 2020 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk ~~

A bid to extend the lifespan of the Fallago Rig wind farm by five years has been given the thumbs-up by Scottish ministers, however.

Energy firm EDF Renewables had wanted to add an extra 12 turbines up to 127m tall to the 48 operational there for the last seven years to increase its potential power output from 144 megawatts to 185.

Its application has been rejected, though, as ministers have upheld planning reporter David Russell’s conclusion that increasing the number of turbines would have too big an adverse visual impact to be offset by any plus points.

In a report written in July 2018 but not published until now, he writes: “Due to their height, elevation and siting in relation to the topographical bowl within which the existing Fallago Rig wind farm is located, the additional turbines would magnify, intensify and extend its landscape and visual effects.

“While the landscape and visual effects of the existing wind farm had been found to be acceptable at the time of its approval, those arising from the additional turbines, as proposed, would be significantly detrimental when combined with the existing wind farm and would not be consistent with many of the objectives and principles on which its design had been based.

“Protecting the landscape is one of the principles identified in Scottish planning policy for assessing whether a development would contribute to sustainable development. I find that, in this regard, the proposed development would not so contribute.

“My findings of significantly detrimental landscape and visual effects arising from the proposed additional turbines would indicate that approval of the proposed development would not be consistent with Scottish Borders council’s local development plan unless the potential damage is considered to be outweighed by wider economic, environmental or other benefits.

“I do not consider that it can be found that the applicants have done what they reasonably can to mitigate the adverse effects of siting these additional, taller turbines towards, or beyond, the top of the topographical bowl in which the existing wind farm is located.

“This is because the design approach did not examine the effects of using shorter towers for the turbines in the most prominent positions – that would have replicated the approach taken in the design of the existing wind farm – and they did not consider the omission of turbines which would be located beyond the top of the topographical bowl.”

It’s now 15 years since the first application for the wind farm was lodged with Scottish Borders Council planners, prompting a lengthy campaign opposing it.

Those campaigners were forced to concede defeat in 2011 after a Court of Session ruling paved the way for the development, approved by Scottish ministers the year before, to proceed.

It was only three years after the wind farm, five miles north-west of Westruther, started operating in 2013 that the bids now rejected to expand it and extend its lifespan were submitted.

The council opposed those follow-up plans, leaving the Scottish Government to have the final say.

Seven of the wind farm’s current turbines, all generating up to 3mw of power, are 110m high and the other 41 are 15m taller.

They had been due to cease operating in 2038, but that has now been put back to 2043 after ministers overruled Mr Russell’s recommendation that a bid by the French-based firm’s Houghton-le-Spring office, near Sunderland, be rejected.

Operation and maintenance of the existing wind farm costs £2.9m a year and supports 11 full-time jobs.

It was estimated that construction of the extra turbines proposed would cost up to £18.2m and that further jobs would be created once they were up and running.

Source:  Plans to expand a controversial wind farm near Lauder already made up of almost 50 turbines have been rejected | By Darin Hutson | The Southern Reporter | Friday, 3rd July 2020 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.