[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Campaigners concerned community benefits colour decision on wind farms  

Credit:  By Susy Macaulay | The Press and Journal | July 4, 2020 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Caithness anti-wind farm campaigners have written to Highland Council’s legal department to challenge what they see as a breach of government guidelines in the authority’s planning process.

Brenda Herrick of Caithness Windfarm Information Forum (Cwif) believes councillors and planners give too much credence to comments in support of wind farm applications that highlight the financial community benefit involved, often running to six figures.

Cwif cites the Scottish Government’s good practice principles for community benefit from onshore renewable energy developments, which state it is not a material consideration in planning, and has no bearing in the planning process.

“Discussions regarding community benefit are held separately to any planning discussions taking place,” the document adds.

Highland Council says its position is clearly stated on its website, with the entry reading: “Scottish Government planning guidance prevents this type of payment from becoming a condition of planning permission.”

But Mrs Harrick is concerned community benefit will be used to support a proposed extension to the locally unpopular Limekiln wind farm at Reay.

She said: “The local support for Strathy South wind farm was almost entirely based on the huge sums of money the community had been promised.

“And I wasn’t happy the benefit was mentioned in discussion of the Creag Riabhach transmission lines in Lairg recently.

“The influence of community benefit on planning decisions has worried me for a long time.

“I wonder how many wind farms have been consented over the years which might not have been if the rules had been properly applied.”

Maxine Smith, north planning applications committee chairwoman, said: “Community benefit is not a material consideration.

“We do not discuss it in planning committee and it is negotiated with communities and developer directly outwith the planning system.”

Source:  By Susy Macaulay | The Press and Journal | July 4, 2020 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.