[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Ruso wind farm decision in ‘abeyance’ until 2021 Legislature meets  

Credit:  By Dave Thompson | Prairie PUblic | May 28, 2020 | prairiepublic.org ~~

The company proposing a wind farm in McLean County has been granted an “abeyance of decision” on its siting application, until the 2021 Legislature finishes its work.

The Ruso (roo’-so) Wind Project has been the subject of a dispute over whether it can install “ADLS” lighting technology, which is required of wind farms by state law. “ADLS” stands for “Aircraft Detection Lighting System.” It replaces the red flashing lights on the wind towers – something that neighbors to wind farms have complained about. “ADLS” uses radar technology to turn on the lights only when an aircraft is nearby. But the Air Force has objected, because of the wind farm’s proximity to the Minot Air Force base.

Ruso submitted an application to the Public Service Commission, asking for a waiver of the “ADLS” requirement. But on a 2 to 1 vote, the PSC voted to “not approve” the application. That motion was not a denial, per se.

Commissioner Julie Fedorchak said the company is hoping the 2021 Legislature will revisit the issue.

“I have not been hearing directly from legislators on this matter,” Fedorchak said. “But I have heard from the wind industry, that they intend to bring forward proposals to address this.”

Fedorchak said she thought there would be enough “wiggle room” for the Commission to grant a waiver. But she was outvoted.

“I found the law to be clear and not allowing wiggle room to approve this,” said Commissioner Randy Christmann.

Christmann said he’s been hearing that the Legislative intent was to allow waivers in these circumstances. But he said the fianl bill didn’t have those waivers.

“That’s why I nerve chose to make a motion to deny the project,” Christmann said.

Source:  By Dave Thompson | Prairie PUblic | May 28, 2020 | prairiepublic.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: