[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Senate pass Gov. Noem’s county zoning, appeal process bill to the House  

Credit:  By Lee Strubinger | SDPB Radio | sdpb.org ~~

South Dakota Senators are sending a bill to the House that changes vote thresholds and the appeals process for Conditional Use Permits.

Supporters say it will prevent rural development from being stymied by the vocal few. Critics say it eliminates the right of the public to object and challenge county decisions.

Governor Kristi Noem’s county zoning and appeal process bill narrows the definition of an aggrieved party.

The party would need to have suffered an injury that is “concrete and particularized,” not hypothetical. It also requires an appellant to show their injury is different from injuries suffered by the public in general.

The bill is aimed at the Conditional Use Permitting process. Conditional Use Permits are needed for developments like hog barns, wind farms and utility projects.

Noem says businesses who want to develop in rural South Dakota want to know the rules of the game.

“They want an open process that’s honest and to make sure they can come in and have some consistency when these projects are being planned,” Noem says. “That is what 157 does.”

The bill doesn’t change county level setbacks, she adds. It’s meant to deter what she calls frivolous lawsuits.

Lawmakers struck a provision in the bill that allows judges to award damages to a farmer or defendant who prevails in court. It gives those who wish to appeal a permit decision 21 days to do so. The courts then have 60 days to rule on an appeal.

Senator Craig Kennedy says he sees problems with the bill. The Democrat from Yankton says it could exclude those who have valid concerns on a Conditional Use Permit decision.

He says frivolous lawsuits should be limited, but…

“On the otherhand, there times when people might have a valid, legitimate reason for objecting,” Kennedy says. “Those people shouldn’t be held to the same standard as the people who do things vexatious or frivolously. That’s my concern.”

Other critics of the bill worry it’s a statewide solution for problems occurring in two or three counties in the state. Senators are sending the bill over to the house on a 24 to 11 vote.

Source:  By Lee Strubinger | SDPB Radio | sdpb.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: