[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court filing challenges Guilford wind farm approval 

Credit:  Chenango County wind farm approval challenged in court | Jeff Platsky | Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin | Feb. 11, 2020 | www.pressconnects.com ~~

A lawsuit attempting to derail a 100-megawatt wind farm accuses Guilford’s town supervisor of a conflict of interest, saying the long-time municipal official should have recused himself from discussions because his sister-in-law is in line to receive payments from the project sponsor.

The 41-page document seeks to nullify a town law that set the parameters for the 25-tower installation, known as High Bridge Wind. Further, the filing calls for the removal of George Seneck, the town supervisor, for a “clear violation of public trust, public welfare and general integrity of the planning process.”

Kennth Kovalchik, an Albany-area land use planner, filed the Article 78 petition in State Supreme Court in Chenango County on behalf of Donald and Barbara Kovalchik, of Unadilla; Ed Kershen, of Mount Upton; and Paulette Gural and Jessica Gombach, of Guilford.

“Town Supervisor George Seneck has an indirect financial interest in the High Bridge Wind Project based on the fact that his sister-in-law signed a lease with High Bridge Wind,” the suit said. “The Supervisor refused to recuse himself. The value of the lease has been redacted from public record, but one could easily surmise the financial value of the lease, over the lifetime of the lease, could be worth hundred’s of thousands of dollars.”

Though leases are claimed to be proprietary, early documents filed in a separate wind farm project by the same project sponsor, Calpine, indicates lease payments for land owners hosting the turbines will be between $2,500 and $30,000 annually.

In late September, the Town of Guilford cleared the way for the wind project as trustees unanimously approved a local law regulating construction and operation of the installation.

Approval came in spite of vigorous local opposition from some town residents who objected to potential visual and other impacts. An organized group lobbied the board to reject the proposal, claiming the project will impair property values and will have long-term health impacts on residents.

Now, the recently filed lawsuit contends Guilford bypassed accepted review procedures when it failed to confer with officials in the neighboring Town of Unadilla, saying several turbines will be installed just beyond the communities’ borders but it had no input into the town land use code governing setbacks and other elements that will guide construction.

“Any effects of sound from the turbines will most likely have a greater impact on Town of Unadilla residents than Town of Guilford residents,” the suit said. “(Unadilla) Supervisor (George) Denys stated ‘we have a vested interest in knowing what the proposed noise limits and low frequency/infrasound impacts will be in the Town of Unadilla. To date, I have received no data in regards to this.’”

The High Bridge application has yet to be deemed in compliance by the state Public Service Commission, and it may be at least another year before the project gets the green light from the state Electric Generation Siting Board.

Estimated annual payments-in-lieu-of-taxes to the Town of Guilford from project sponsors could be more than $400,000, representing a substantial boost for the Chenango County community with an annual budget of $900,000.

Rather than acting as an independent review board, the suit alleges the project developer “dictate(d) to the Town of Guilford Town Board what the setbacks should be in the Local (Land Use) Law.”

The turbines, which will rise up to 675 feet from the base to blade tip, will be installed along the peak of ridge lines in the town.

Renewable energy projects are being encouraged as New York tries to achieve its ambitious goal of 70% of the state’s electric generation from renewable sources by 2030, and 100% by 2040.

Source:  Chenango County wind farm approval challenged in court | Jeff Platsky | Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin | Feb. 11, 2020 | www.pressconnects.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky