[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Ruling on huge wind farms pushed back  

Credit:  Stuart Anderson | Eastern Daily Press | 29 January 2020 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

The government has again delayed a ruling on whether two of the biggest wind farms in the world can be built off the north Norfolk coast.

The delay will give residents who live near a massive wind farm substation planned for the Norfolk countryside more time to make their voices heard.

Kwasi Kwarteng, business, energy and clean growth minister said Ørsted’s Hornsea Three and Vattenfall’s Norfolk Vanguard projects would now be decided on by June 1 – after having already delayed the decision several times last year.

Mr Kwarteng said the new deadline would: “allow further information to be provided and assessed including any further consultation required”.

Norfolk Vanguard and another wind farm planned by Vattenfall called Boreas are planned to make landfall at Happisburgh, with underground cables connecting it to a substation at Necton, near Swaffham, from where it will link into the National Grid.

Horsea Three would make landfall at Waybourne and link to a substation at Swardeston, south of Norwich.

Jenny Smedley, from the Necton Substations Action Group, said: “We’re very pleased the secretary of state has given the project even more time, because that gives us more time to get our point across.”

Mrs Smedley said a planning inspector and a representative from Vattenfall were in Necton last week to see the planned substation site, and she and other nearby residents were able to suggest an alternative.

She said: “The site they’ve chosen is the highest point in the area and it is on a farm that’s very productive. But there’s another farm quite close that’s 10 metres lower, and the farmer is willing to sell it because they’re already putting roads through his farm.

“The planning inspector was very interested in our alternative site.”

Julian Pearson, from the parish council in nearby Holme Hale, said he did not object to the substation out of hand, but said its impact on the environment should be mitigated.

Mr Pearson, who has mocked up his own ‘unofficial’ graphic of what the substation would look like, based on measurements given, said: “They said they are not going to look at mitigation in detail until after consent is granted”.

A spokesman for Ørsted said they welcomed the delay.

He said: “Ørsted requested a short extension to help conclude ongoing discussions with key stakeholders. We trust that these discussions should facilitate the secretary of state in making a positive determination on the project.”

A spokesman from Vattenfall said: “We welcome confirmation of a decision timeline for Norfolk Vanguard. The projects can make a significant contribution to reaching 40GW by 2030, up from around 22GW today. Vattenfall continues to work with local and national stakeholders to deliver the best possible projects it can.”

Source:  Stuart Anderson | Eastern Daily Press | 29 January 2020 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: