[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

More scrutiny a must for turbines  

Credit:  By Steven Green | The Dispatch | Jan 23, 2020 | mdcoastdispatch.com ~~

Over the course of five hours, the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) should have heard enough concerns to warrant further examination of the proposed offshore wind turbines, specially their significant changes in height.

The concept behind last week’s public hearing was to hear from the concerned citizens and government officials who requested a public hearing to relay concerns over the significant increase in wind turbine heights with both offshore project developers. After holding the hearing, which attracted about 800 people in Ocean City last Saturday, the PSC must now determine if an evidentiary hearing, a more formal proceeding, should be held for further review of the change in wind turbine height.

It’s important to note the PSC is a regulatory body and its discretion is limited. The PSC was, however, the body that granted the pivotal renewable credits credits to the two developers – Orsted and U.S. Wind. Even if an evidentiary hearing is granted before the PSC, it would be foolish to believe the projects are in jeopardy.

We believe these wind farm projects can be beneficial from economic and environmental standpoints, but we question the transparency and merits of the process at the federal and state levels. We support the call for more information on the specifics of the turbine heights before the projects can move into the next phases.

What we don’t necessarily agree with is the Town of Ocean City’s demand the turbines be a certain mileage from shore. We disagree with the assumption beach-goers and oceanfront property owners will be disgruntled if they can see the turbines from the shore. We also believe there is some misleading being done by Ocean City with unrealistic computer renderings portraying the wind turbines off the coast.

It’s frankly an unknown whether a majority of tourists, property owners and prospective buyers will be turned off if their sunrise from the beach includes some spinning thumbnail or slightly bigger wind turbines. It’s really a guess at this point how visible they will be from the beach. It’s clear each day will be different, and most days they will not be noticeable, due to clouds on the horizon, winds and hazy conditions in the summer.

What’s clear at this point is the projects have been at altered in the middle of the process and after approvals. Therefore, we see enough reason to get more information from the developers before proceeding.

Source:  By Steven Green | The Dispatch | Jan 23, 2020 | mdcoastdispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: