[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Page County Board of Supervisors proceed with wind turbine ordinance  

Credit:  By John Van Nostrand | BH News Service | www.nonpareilonline.com ~~

CLARINDA – The Page County Board of Supervisors decided 1,500 feet is far enough.

A month after two public hearings gathering comments and opinions about the county’s wind turbine ordinance, in which setback distances were a common theme, supervisors agreed Tuesday they won’t change the distance.

“Sixteen-hundred feet setback is the most or companies won’t come in,” said Supervisor Jon Herzberg.

Speculating wind turbines will be built in Page County, the supervisors approved a list of rules and regulations in October regarding the construction and operation of the electric-generating towers that can stand as tall as 300 feet.

One detail is the setback must be 1.1 times the total height of the tower, or 1,500-feet, whatever is greater from the nearest structure.

“To change the ordinance for another 100 feet; I’m not comfortable,” said Supervisor Chuck Morris.

Those in attendance expressed their concern how a neighbor may be interested in having a tower on his property, but the tower be easily seen from their own place.

“Supervisors are looking out for big corporations whose money is going somewhere and landowners that don’t live here, that make their money other ways,” said Jane Stimson. “They don’t give a rip about what’s going on here. I think you are looking out for them more than you are looking out for those of us who have been in families for generations in this county and we’ve socially helped the county and we’ve financially helped the county. And you are selling us out.”

Supervisor Chuck Morris said he respected Stimson’s opinion, but said the county only looking out for the wind turbine industry and those in favor of turbines is “ludicrous.”

“What’s best for the taxpayers,” he said. “Whichever we land, we’ve got people pretty upset and we understand that. The people that are counting on that income for their farm operations, if we tell them that we are going to do something and you aren’t going to have that opportunity, they are going to be as mad or as upset at us as you are going to be if we allow it.”

Morris said he knows of people in support of wind turbines and added they are not public with their interest to avoid criticism.

Jean Ellison fears a landowner who does not want a turbine may be “overwhelmed” by surrounding neighbors who do want a turbine.

Supervisor Alan Armstrong was not in attendance but participated in the meeting by a telephone.

Source:  By John Van Nostrand | BH News Service | www.nonpareilonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.