Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way, nor should it be implied that the writers endorse National Wind Watch.
Germany’s woes with wind power offer a lesson for the U.S.
Credit: Express-Times | Dec 10, 2019 | www.lehighvalleylive.com ~~
In his Dec. 6 guest column, “Pa. stands to gain by joining RGGI,” (Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative), the Sierra Club’s Tom Schuster lays out an extensive and elaborate argument supporting Gov. Tom Wolf’s action to join RGGI. He presents an appealing picture that CO2 emissions will be dramatically reduced at “little to no cost,” “electric bills would decrease,” “hundreds of thousands of jobs” would be created …”
He’s wrong.
These rosy pictures and promises were made previously in other countries that committed early to the “war on global warming.” Their outcomes were dramatically opposite. Germans were told their electric bills would at most go up by only the cost of another scoop of ice cream. Their costs have risen to nearly the highest in the world. An increasing number of families are being classified as “energy poor.”
Perhaps even worse, Germany (and Australia and the UK) has destabilized its electric grid by loading it with intermittent wind and solar power. Germany’s counterpart to the U.S. head of FEMA advises citizens to keep “candles, matches, food, water, batteries” etc. at home at all times. He fears frequent and widespread blackouts.
Germany needs to build 1,400 additional wind turbines annually to meet its plan; this year it built just 35, and threw 25,000 workers out of jobs. They’re running into cruel realities.
The Sierra Club preaches from ideology, not physical and economic realities. It is not a credible source of guidance on energy and power grid governance.
James M. Policelli
Plainfield Township
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |
Share: