[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Is St. Croix County wind battle over? Town says so  

Credit:  Town of Forest leaders issued a statement claiming victory in the decade-old battle, though the firm proposing a wind farm said the project continues. | By Mike Longaecker | RiverTowns | Nov 6th 2019 | www.rivertowns.net ~~

Township leaders have claimed victory in a multi-year battle over a St. Croix County wind farm project, though the energy company behind the project offered no sign that its efforts were through.

The town of Forest released a statement Oct. 28 saying it believes the developer, Leeward Renewable Energy, has abandoned plans to erect 44 wind turbines in the rural community about 6 miles northwest of Glenwood City.

Town Chairman Jaime Junker said the board based its statement on a key decision from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission (PSC). Junker said that required the project to comply with state noise standards 100% of the time.

“The town just feels that’s a very significant item in this whole situation,” Junker told RiverTown Multimedia Nov. 1, adding that the requirement leaves “no wiggle room” for Leeward to operate out of compliance.

The PSC had previously adopted a 95% noise compliance standard, but did away with a percentage-based standard in a 2016 decision. A PSC spokesman said “it is not technically accurate” that eliminating the percentage-based standard equates to a 100% compliance requirement.

The news release states the town obtained “a modification in the application from the PSC.” Spokesman Matt Sweeney, PSC’s communications and legislative director, said the town’s 100% figure was unclear and that he wasn’t sure what document supported that statement.

Junker said removal of the 95% requirement means the project would have to abide the state’s “absolute” noise laws.

“Take that (95% requirement) away, which the PSC did, and now you have to meet the law, or be in compliance 100% of the time,” he said.

Asked about the status of its Highland Wind Project, a Leeward spokesperson indicated the effort is ongoing.

“Leeward Renewable Energy is continuing the development of the Highland Wind Project, including working with the MISO in support of the ongoing electrical interconnection study,” the company said in a statement. “We will provide additional updates when they become available.”

MISO is the Midcontinent Independent System Operator organization that manages a 15-state energy program through the Midwest. States include Wisconsin, Minnesota and North Dakota, as well as Manitoba, Canada.

The town of Forest has been at odds with the wind project since 2011, when the turbines were proposed. Community leaders have argued that noise from turbines can harm sleep ability and have other negative health impacts for people living near the 400-foot wind towers.

That led the town to seek a compliance standard. The wind developer countered that comprehensive noise monitoring and reporting standards were “more than adequate” to ensure noise limit compliance, according to a 2016 PSC decision.

Junker said the town board voted to move ahead with its statement in spite of the fact that Leeward maintains the project has momentum. The town board passed an Oct. 8 resolution claiming victory over the proposed project and approved a news release that includes a statement from Junker saying “we haven’t heard anything from Leeward in months and the feeling here in the town is that they have moved on.”

“Rest assured, we believe what the press release says,” Junker said in Nov. 1 interview.

Source:  Town of Forest leaders issued a statement claiming victory in the decade-old battle, though the firm proposing a wind farm said the project continues. | By Mike Longaecker | RiverTowns | Nov 6th 2019 | www.rivertowns.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: