[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Hegins to hear wind farm developer appeal  

Credit:  Vicki Terwilliger | Republican Herald | October 14, 2019 | www.republicanherald.com ~~

The Hegins Township Zoning Hearing Board has scheduled a meeting to hear an appeal by wind farm developer Clean Air Generation LLC.

The public meeting will be 6 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 31, at the Hegins Area Ambulance Association building, 352 Gap St., in Valley View.

CAG, of Waverly, had filed a zoning permit application for 40 wind turbines to be constructed on leased Rausch Creek land, known as “Anthracite Ridge.” Allan Swab, township zoning officer, denied the permit application, and CAG appealed the decision to the zoning hearing board.

Nicholas Cohen is CAG principal and Tomer Droval, of Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd., of Israel, is partnering with CAG on any potential project in Hegins.

In June, CAG submitted a “substantive validity challenge” to the township asserting that the township’s current zoning ordinance was deficient because it did not address where wind energy development could occur. The wind farm developer had suggested a curative amendment to the ordinance would be to permit wind energy projects in the township’s S-3 special purpose mining zone.

The Hegins Township supervisors agreed in August that CAG’s challenge had merit. However, the township decided to come up with its own correction of that zoning ordinance defect.

The township hired John R. Varaly, a Wilkes-Barre professional planning consultant, to study the matter and draft a “preliminary proposed alternate municipal curative amendment.”

Interested parties had until Sept. 30 to send written comments to Varaly on the proposed fix.

Varaly’s 18-page draft, plus pages of exhibits, addressed wind energy facility compliance on many levels. Among the regulations noted for consideration were: noise, vibrations, accessory buildings, underground power line transmission, color, lighting, shadow flicker, ice throw, distance between turbines, visual impact, height and setback distances and decommissioning when the wind turbine life had expired.

Source:  Vicki Terwilliger | Republican Herald | October 14, 2019 | www.republicanherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: