[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Lawmakers question Albany meeting location for Long Island wind project  

Credit:  By Cayla Harris | Times Union | September 30, 2019 | www.timesunion.com ~~

ALBANY – Two members of the state Legislature are criticizing the Department of Public Service for scheduling a meeting in Albany next week regarding a Long Island wind project.

In a letter to the Department of Public Service on Monday, state Sen. Ken LaValle, R-Long Island, and Assemblyman Fred Thiele, I-Sag Harbor, asked officials to relocate a conference about the location of a transmission line for an offshore wind farm.

The meeting is booked for Oct. 8 at the public service department’s office in Albany, but the farm is set to be constructed in East Hampton – a 250-mile gap that legislators say hinders local stakeholders from voicing their opinions on the project, which has already stewed controversy in Long Island. East Hampton town Supervisor Peter Van Scoyoc also signed the letter.

“While this location may be convenient for the Public Service Commission and the attorneys and lobbyists for the applicant, it is a hardship for locally based parties to this proceeding who wish to personally attend this meeting,” the officials wrote.

The lawmakers noted that there is no legal obligation to hold the meeting in Albany and asked to switch the location to East Hampton, “where the project is to be located and where public interest and potential impacts are the greatest.”

“Holding meetings more than 250 miles away from the host community evinces a continued lack of concern for public involvement and participation,” the lawmakers wrote. “In turn, this can only serve to make the ultimate settlement of issues regarding this project even more difficult.”

Source:  By Cayla Harris | Times Union | September 30, 2019 | www.timesunion.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: