[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Seneca Wind Farm delayed by filing error  

Credit:  Original headline: Seneca company withdraws its application for 77-turbine wind farm | Seneca Wind Farm company withdraws application, plans to refile | Staff Report | Fremont News Messenger | Aug. 9, 2019 | Updated Aug. 10, 2019 | www.thenews-messenger.com ~~

FREMONT – The company that has proposed a 77-turbine wind farm in Seneca County is withdrawing its application to the Ohio Power Siting Board, citing a filing error, but said it will refile its request in the fall once the mistake has been corrected.

“Doing this right is more important than trying to continue forward at this time. We want to make sure the process is done correctly,” said Jeffery Nemeth, Director of Wind Development for sPower.

A similar project, the Republic Wind Farm, proposed for Seneca and Sandusky counties, has generated opposition from residents who have raised a number of objections, including concerns over erecting turbines in a region where much of the land lies on an unstable karst foundation.

In a news release issued Friday, sPower said that after it received a Determination of No Hazard permit from the Federal Aviation Administration in July, the company “realized there was a mistake in how the public notices were handled, requiring the FAA to cancel the permit and provide a new public notice and comment period.”

As a result, sPower said it is withdrawing its application to the siting board, but “will refile with the OPSB when the corrected Determination of No Hazard is issued by the FAA and the OPSB can have the full set of materials it needs to properly review the project.”

“sPower remains committed to (the) Seneca project and the many landowners and communities that will benefit from the project.”

“This is a good project,” Nemeth said in the news release, “and we have every reason to believe we will receive DNHs for each turbine and will be resubmitting our application to the OPSB this fall.”

The Seneca Wind project calls for a 200-megawatt farm consisting of up to 77 wind turbines on approximately 25,000 acres of privately leased land in Scipio, Reed, Venice, Eden and Bloom townships.

Apex Clean Energy’s proposal for the Republic Wind Farm, with 47 turbines in Seneca and Sandusky county, is awaiting a ruling from the siting board, with construction expected to begin in 2020.

Source:  Original headline: Seneca company withdraws its application for 77-turbine wind farm | Seneca Wind Farm company withdraws application, plans to refile | Staff Report | Fremont News Messenger | Aug. 9, 2019 | Updated Aug. 10, 2019 | www.thenews-messenger.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: