[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Beyond wind and solar  

Credit:  Roswell Daily Record | August 6, 2019 | www.rdrnews.com ~~

I can’t believe anyone actually thinks New Mexico can decarbonize by 2050. That is exactly what the state is trying to do with their Clean Energy Transition Act (CETA) which plans to replace fossil fuels for generating electricity with non-fuel intermittent based wind and solar energy assisted by natural gas (oops, that’s stored carbon).

New Mexico regulators are just now charting the CETA requirements into two parallel paths, one to determine how to finance and implement the decommissioning of the coal fire power plants up near the Four Corners and the second path to determine how to replace the lost electricity from those closures.

PNM is just now conducting presentations up in Farmington of how the customers on the west side of the state are going to save money under the CETA guidelines. Xcel is building hundreds of wind turbines on the east side of the state with the promise of lower customer electricity cost at the same time asking the state for a rate increase to finance building the wind farm per the CETA requirements.

Let me start this off with an example of power density: “No amount of marketing could change the poor physics of resource-intensive and land-intensive renewables. Solar farms take 450 times more land than nuclear power plants, and wind farms take 700 times more land than natural gas wells, to produce the same amount of energy.” – Michael Shellenberger, Environmental Progress.

What that is truly saying is that the enchanted lands of New Mexico will become the industrial landscape of New Mexico.

So the real question becomes, why are we investing multi-billion dollars in an energy source that only has a 30-year life span at best before we have to replace it in 2050? CETA has no provision for replacement cost (more taxpayer subsidies) or a clean-up fund (rate payer capital bonds) for decommissioning and storage of the toxic materials as they are retired.

If you thought the ‘unused’ rusting farm equipment laying all over the countryside is an eyesore, wait until to see the rusting wind turbines and solar panels spewed all over the place.

At least the farmers can hide their waste.

Martin Kral

Source:  Roswell Daily Record | August 6, 2019 | www.rdrnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.