[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy ordinance discussed 

Credit:  Charlotte Underwood | Winterset Madisonian | Jul 31, 2019 | www.wintersetmadisonian.com ~~

A proposed wind energy ordinance and temporary moratorium was once again discussed at Tuesday morning’s county supervisor meeting. The meeting room was crowded with citizens speaking both for and against wind turbines. Each person that spoke challenged supervisors to find a “fair way” to represent “all sides and all citizens” of the county.

After discussing the issue again at length, and hearing from citizens, supervisors each agreed to “make a list” of what they want in a specific wind energy ordinance. That list will then be taken to the county’s planning and zoning department head, who will then draft the ordinance, which would then be checked over by the county’s attorney. The ordinance draft would then go before the planning and zoning board. Once the ordinance reaches the zoning board, the public should have an opportunity for input before it is passed, according to officials.

Once again, Fitch suggested a moratorium on future wind energy projects in the county until the ordinance can be made “concrete.” The moratorium time frame she suggested was four months. Initially, Supervisor Aaron Price was not in favor of a moratorium. Once he clarified that the moratorium would not be retroactive and would in no way impact the Arbor Hills Wind Energy project that is currently tied up in the court system, he said he would possibly entertain the notion of a four-month moratorium.

Price said he was concerned with further litigation if the moratorium was enacted retroactive, and suggested the county confer with its legal counsel before even looking at the four-month moratorium that would stop wind mills being constructed until the specific wind ordinance was finalized.

“Everyone has to be represented,” Price said.

The ordinance and moratorium were first proposed by Supervisor Diane Fitch two weeks ago, and would have enacted stricter contingencies on wind energy companies such as greater set-backs, more disclosure to the public regarding proposed wind turbine locations and project time lines, lengthier application processes as well as less public impact with shadow, auditory issues, and environmental impacts. At that meeting and again on Tuesday, Fitch expressed concern that large corporations “had all the rights” leaving little for private land owners to do.

At that meeting Price said that he felt the proposed ordinance was “too restrictive and unfair” to those that were in favor of wind turbines in the county. He also said he felt it would place the county “in the middle” of personal contracts between private land owners and corporations.

Supervisors heard from two citizens who had requested to be placed on the supervisor agenda to speak specifically on wind energy, and then heard from about eight more people at the end of the meeting during the public comment portion. Attorney Tom Revely spoke to supervisors, offering a multitude of information and statistics regarding the affects of turbines on health and property values. Revely is the attorney for the Madison County Coalition for Scenic Preservation and is involved with the litigation against the county’s board of adjustment regarding the Arbor Hills Wind Turbine project.

Other individuals spoke of having signed the wind energy contracts and “regretting it”, as well as asking for “forgiveness of their neighbors for not being a good neighbor.” Some spoke of decreased land values and others said they “had turbines on their property and that was not true”.

Ultimately both sides asked supervisors to “protect the rights of tax payers”.

Others spoke on how it was their right to have turbines on their land and a “privilege” to help provide energy for America.”

Supervisor Price said that a new ordinance would not happen over night. Officials said they would work on a compromise that would be fair to the citizens and would begin making a wind energy ordinance priority list that they would then take to planning and zoning for a workshop.

Source:  Charlotte Underwood | Winterset Madisonian | Jul 31, 2019 | www.wintersetmadisonian.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky